14159th poster gets a cookie (cookie thread (Part 7)) (Part 11)

weren’t you on intensify’s team??

no???

i think we’ve had this conversation more than once :sob:

probably

i mean that and that entire event was designed to be pvp

you just let Locke play 3.5e at a high level

1 Like

Also LMAO at the story. You word it like that guy was the jerk but he also sounds like a really funny madlad, he’s my favorite. I wouldn’t abuse loopholes but id make the strongest character possible i can

2 Likes

Ethical optimizing involves communicating character power level before you start breaking things

2 Likes

i think optimizer friend would enjoy 3.5e

1 Like

It’s a problem when people are playing entirely different games to each other

3 Likes

Double that if you don’t even know that until the dice roll
Triple if the DM doesn’t know

2 Likes

What if i make “theorycraft the game”. Give an absolute ton of build options and just let players try to make the most broken characters. God id love to play that :weary:

1 Like

Im not immune to this I pulled an evil ass build during the arete campaign
And didn’t even tell arete before I did it

3 Likes

That’s fun

3 Likes

Morbius

1 Like

this was called “the one game willow ran and didn’t finish that we instantly broke”

5 Likes

LMAO

That was significantly less evil than the guy I played temporarily when we were at super high level before switching back to Idmon

1 Like

But yeah Morthis was bullshit

3 Likes

who was that again? Highkey forgot

i like the idea of “one absurdly strong character in a group of mediocre characters” and “one absurdly weak character in a group of mediocre characters that still has to help”

4 Likes