this is a general question
Consider: the guy who killed Brian Thompson.
Not an endorsement of violence, but I feel like that makes a pretty compelling argument for yes.
thatâs an assassination not a murder (I think the answer is yes but still)
thatâs my main argument mhm
assassinations of people i dislike could be attractive
same difference you can also murder people i dislike
yes
i really thought thatâd be more decisive
wait attractive in what sense
i didnât even get one âwhat the fuck atlasâ
bad result! boo!!
public class Assassination extends Murder
attractive def. 1a
Okay arousing interest definitely, people are inherently curious
i so thought that wouldâve been decisive
ash next q. your group project can wait
Fire.
youâre asking the question
itâs a turn based debate thing that isnt really debate
Letâs say a random person will die today.
You can stop that person from dying, but this would cause two other random people to die in ten years.
Is it ethical to save the random person? Is it ethical not to save the random person?
thatâs a statistics one i think
without doing the calc just let them die
with only that information given itâs probably only ethical to not save them