27772nd poster gets a cookie (cookie thread (Part 7)) (Part 10)

this is a general question

1 Like

Consider: the guy who killed Brian Thompson.

Not an endorsement of violence, but I feel like that makes a pretty compelling argument for yes.

that’s an assassination not a murder (I think the answer is yes but still)

1 Like

that’s my main argument mhm

assassinations of people i dislike could be attractive

1 Like

same difference you can also murder people i dislike

2 Likes

yes

1 Like

i really thought that’d be more decisive

1 Like

wait attractive in what sense

1 Like

i didn’t even get one “what the fuck atlas”
bad result! boo!!

1 Like

public class Assassination extends Murder

1 Like

attractive def. 1a

2 Likes

Okay arousing interest definitely, people are inherently curious

1 Like

i so thought that would’ve been decisive

1 Like

ash next q. your group project can wait

1 Like

Fire.

you’re asking the question

it’s a turn based debate thing that isnt really debate

2 Likes

Let’s say a random person will die today.
You can stop that person from dying, but this would cause two other random people to die in ten years.
Is it ethical to save the random person? Is it ethical not to save the random person?

that’s a statistics one i think
without doing the calc just let them die

1 Like

with only that information given it’s probably only ethical to not save them

2 Likes