7 years old, they must play mafia and win ten games in a row before being able to join the internet as a whole
5 Likes
because I think well. I mean. on principle I donāt think parents should have control over this. But it is also generally bad for children to be on the internet. Though I also donāt have great metrics for what childhoods look like. 10 years old?
1 Like
also like. the Internet is a really big space
1 Like
the most generic non-awful answer i can give to not the best question would be āwith guidance, before their friends can. then, overlooking.ā
but that depends on my child being trustworthy which they may not be
2 Likes
I think it should be a gradual introduction with supervision if thereās no specific kid it applies
Online game sites, sites meant for kids and youtube at 6
social media and forums as 12+, only supervise on genuine worries
16 and up free for all no supervision
may not be the best exact values but itās near it
1 Like
is it my turn to ask a question or are we done or some other thing
1 Like
it is yes
1 Like
You can go.
Wasnāt as fun a question as I was hoping.
oh the questions game is back
1 Like
you ask lame super super broad moral questions that have very easy answers
2 Likes
ā¦oh this was a serious qsn
1 Like
not true!
this is a debate* game
1 Like
question game but itās on your morals
1 Like
it wouldnāt be on your morals if it wasnt for ASH
2 Likes
what sorts of things should schools teach? (i.e. are the people who say āinsert subject here is useless we should learn how to do our TAXES insteadā correct)
1 Like
well arenāt debates just questioning peopleās morals
debate* are more fun
english science mathematics maybe technology in super later years and electives
3 Likes
wow you think we should be doomed to repeat the mistakes of our pastā¦ okā¦
1 Like
history doesnāt repeat itself as much as you think it does
if it did weād be able to predict the stock market
1 Like