Idk this part is bugging me like. Why not?
No money
Thatās different
itās automating away creative work as creative work is being automated
And thatās wrong?
not whats being asked
1 Like
I asked that question as a response to Ash, who said itās wrong to automate away creative work
1 Like
phrase your questions better
thereās something here thatās just buried under layers of things you think are known but arent
2 Likes
I! Was! Responding! To! Ash! Who had just said! It was wrong! To automate! āCreative workā!
The game doesnāt have to get stuck on my question we can move on
yet two people got it wrong so maybe you should think a little harder
Or we can keep talking about this IDC
1 Like
I think this is flawed too but idt itās essential to your argument
Basically the question Iām asking is āif this automation does creative work that nobody was actually ever going to do in the first place without it, is that still wrong?ā
okay so
āa guy makes a video game, and does everything except the art. he cannot do the art. is automating the art wrongā?
1 Like
Yes
Or what I said above, if the automation is enabling creativity that couldnāt happen without it, is that still bad
now thats a thinker
I think itās wrong if you have the means?
The Roottrees are Dead is a good example: it was originally a Game Jam game, and given that time frame and the devsā inexperience, it used AI art to achieve its vision.
When it became a full-fledged game, the developed hired an actual artist to do the pictures.