I don’t think this is exclusive to capitalism. If there’s any resource scarcity this exists
2 Likes
i’m mentally on the video game example
4 Likes
Even if there’s full even distribution, if there’s 8 billion people and only 1 million fancystuff, most people aren’t gonna have it, most people aren’t gonna see it
Museum
1 Like
if someone wins every single game of a (non-spectator/non-money focused) sport, should they be banned so everyone else has a chance/has fun?
museum of chairs…
2 Likes
Yea probably
…so you put it in a museum, where nobody gets to use it?
3 Likes
I mean it depends on if they enjoy winning too i guess
No
i think it would be silly to assume that there are no cases in which the use of AI art is not “wrong” in some way
let’s say its 10 people playing a weird variant of tag
one player is the flash
AI art killed my grandma
2 Likes
they tag everyone who moves within a milisecond
1 Like
Or, well, like… “banned” is a weird word to use here
1 Like
Yea they should be stopping crime
1 Like
this being said I can think of exactly one example total where it actually added to the work it was used in and even then I don’t know for a fact it was AI, I just suspect it strongly
2 Likes
prevented from playing the game
banned is the word i’m looking for
1 Like
so the hitrate is insanely low
1 Like
If this isn’t a spectator/money focused sport, there’s probably no governing body here, right? Or I guess not necessarily, there’s different levels:
- Rec league shit, no formal governing body, etc: The Flash is free to play all they want, and other people are free to not play with the Flash if they want – any attempt to “ban” or “prevent” anybody from playing an informal for-fun sport with no incentives is ridiculous
- “High school sports” level, Officially
organized but not for money: I think it’s probably bad for the governing body to ban the Flash - Professional level: outside the scope of the conversation
2 Likes