About the Rules & Moderation category (Part 1)

fun!!!

you and i have very different definitions of fun

1 Like

thbthtbhtbt I could sub out DA + SW for Cerenovus + Goblin

(and then also sub pacifist with something of course)

tbh i dislike the drunk mutant combo but not necessarily because they fill the same niche

It’s weird to have to pretend to be a Townsfolk who isn’t allowed to consider they might be the Drunk

2 Likes

Add Cannibal for more fun

1 Like

NYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I think cannibal will encourage group cliff walk-off thtbthbthtbh

which is. not necessarily a bad thing, but,

yeah it’s pretty much that

It’s the one image of “I think I might benthe Drunk” —Cannibal with the Mutant ability

2 Likes

NYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! ok that’s very funny

being not even allowed to speculate that you’re the drunk is bad and arguably does more to confirm they’re mutant than anything else they could possibly do

couldn’t it just be ruled that they’re allowed to consider this as long as they are still trying to convince the group they’re actually as townsfolk


new title and changes thtbhtbthbthtb

1 Like

i think this is the reasonable st interpretation but strict text truthers would kill them with hammers

1 Like

I would do the reasonable interpretation then :relieved:

Yes but it means if they can convince the group they’re Good they can harmlessly slot themselves in as the Drunk without disrupting info/Outsider slots

1 Like

you can’t just let “i’m probably the drunk” be an out for their misinfo so you have to draw the line somewhere

1 Like

I mean. outsider slots are already pretty destroyed here, perhaps barring Xaan

1 Like