About the Rules & Moderation category (Part 1)

They are inactive because tehy are inactive. Go tohell

1 Like

Does ybw know


Uh oh chat. ā€œQuestionsā€ implies bad

1 Like

i may be misremembering the exact question but it definitely wanted something to do with noble gasses. awful

they’ll post the set soon and then i can accurately complain about it

Nevermind I got a 110

1 Like

ā€œI bet I failedā€ guy who didn’t failed

1 Like

cs nerds tell me is ā€œnumber of variablesā€ an equivalent answer to ā€œnumber of argumentsā€

for context it was a bonus part about how currying involves the use of multiple functions with a decreasing amount of this, or something like that

i’m vaguely familiar with what currying is! i guess i was just mathbrain pilled and thinking in a world where variables and function arguments are basically equivalent

I’m not a CS nerd but I’d say they’re probably different

george orwell

by cs nerds i meant zug

AAAAAAAAAA I LOVE CURRYING

and no
number of variables is not the same as number of arguments

arguments are the things you’re putting into the function
variables are variables

george orwell invented cs terminology

1 Like

i’m a math major i think of functions in terms of the number of variables they admit. why does cs have to be weird about it

x = 0 # x is a variable but is not used as an argument
print(f(3)) # f is called with 1 argument, but the argument is not a variable

real concerns by real quizbowlers

1 Like

negging the depression tossup with like. multiple sclerosis because it incorrectly called 5-httlpr a gene instead of a polymorphism (i’ll be having a word with the editing team)

i’ve changed my mind let the med school people wreak havoc on the bio distro again. genetics people are so much worse