does the anticlaim immunity persist after you die dia
1 Like
no i see it 100%
1 Like
boop
sorry me sick
2 Likes
what be happen-
dafuq
1 Like
This is probably the one thing that makes me intrigued by your tierlist of reads.
Overall, you have Leafia in your lowest tier, me the tier above it and then jarek and chomps (The next lowest posters) slightly higher and higher again. What is it about post counts that you find āinherently scummyā / āinherently trustworthyā?
Some people naturally post more than others, thereās nobody here who I know for being a very high poster tbh. Iām trying to make sure Iām always keeping up on things but Iām also a player who sometimes mulls things over in my mind rather than posting all of my thoughts because otherwise theyād be a weird and probably contradicting paragraph of āfluffā.
Sheeping someone who you have low on your list is an interesting play, plus gummy overall actually has a decently high amount of posts (though not necessarily very substantive ones) so are you caring more about the substance of the posts regarding gummy? Or are you still purely looking at the post count? (To where Gummy is in the top half of players)
1 Like
I also find an inherent bias which leads me to interact with those I already know, but Iāve been trying to interact a good bit with someone I donāt know too much - albeit recognising I may or may not also be tunnelled at the same time
2 Likes
I donāt think there is anything inherently towny/scummy about posting more/less, but I do recognize that Iām very biased by it. I think itās partially like recency bias? I tend to favor whoever spoke most recently
I donāt actively like look at the post counts, itās more like a subconscious influence Iām more conscious of now
more unnecessary details behind my mindset that Iāve thought too much about:
- I usually read everyoneās posts with the assumption they are town. I am not very good at social reads that go like āthis comes from a town/wolf mindsetā although Iāve been trying to consider those more. but I donāt know how other people think, and itās hard for me to claim that someone would definitely think a certain way
- I like knowing how/why other people think, but I donāt think very hard about the analytics, itās more curiosity
- Iām not good at suspecting people, so what I usually end up is a list of people with varying amounts of towniness, and then I take the bottom tier or two
- people who are more active in the thread get more townread by me because I like talking to people and if Iāve talked to them more, Iām more predisposed to think positively of them. I also just feel more bad voting someone who talks a lot/felt like they were very involved
- somewhat trying to account for this bias, I try to focus on specific posts/interactions from lower posting players that feel too weird to come from mafia. this is not that effective since Iām starting to think itās more player-specific than alignment-specific
- thought-out posts like yours/jarekās feel very good, but Iām also automatically warier because more thought/calculation goes into them, and I canāt tell howā¦sincere? they really are
- probably could go into more rambling but I also have to leave so just ask followup questions if you have
and yes, Iām starting to realize we play very differently. I like your playstyle for what itās worth, the general āpost less fluff and more coherent thoughts/conclusionsā is something I keep wanting to do, but then a game starts, and I automatically fall back into spamming mode. I think I play more for the social interaction and less for the social deduction (sorry), and how I play is pretty flawed
sheeping gummy (and/or whoever is loud) is a bit of a holdover from qbcord. she usually has a better direction/confidence in pushing specific people, and I generally trust her reads over mine. if sheās evil, Iāll worry about it in the future
also appreciate you reaching out, itās cool to talk to someone new, but Iām bad at initiating
1 Like
Do you know me
Iāve played with you a bunch so at least thereās that familiarity perhaps is the right word to use here, between ourselves.
Iāll take it
I think that was a productive conversation
indicated by the fact the game is going nowhere
1 Like
VOTE: Jarek
help @ kiiruma/jarek/others
if neighborhood has anticlaim immunity, I would assume itās because thereās a wolf in there because it makes more mechanical āsenseā to give the neighbors protection from being anticlaimed if they claimed within the neighborhood
but is that the type of [making alignment assumptions off role] assumption that zone would actively punish by subverting?
not saying here that dia having such immunity means itās a towncoded role or anything
two wolves and a neutral would be incredibly funny actually but probably too odd
i can guarantee you this is not the case
The anti-claim immunity part is probably part of the bait to subvert expectations to be honest. Purely speculation though and taken with so many grains of salt that youāre in the red sea.
As for what it means for the game I have no idea. Iād sayā¦well again with the massive grain of salt speculation; that the immunity to anti-claim is because thereās a wolf in the hood chat - itād beā¦well a bit silly, if someones role was instantly anti-claimable to the wolf in that chat because they knew their role from being in the chat.
That, or it was expected that the hood chat would be much likelier to full claim and to provide incentive to do that they made the chat un-anti-claimable or something. Still means a wolf is probably in it to make that not just free claims.