like basically the first things all of them did was push one of the others
if i was neutral i would be subbing the fuck out i hate neutral roles
it does make sense to treat the neighborhood as a not-all-pure check especially if one of them brought the idea up in there
1 Like
last game didn’t zone say his progression had been pure → 1 mafia → 2 mafia → [and now this game…] but surely a subversion in some way now
oh yeah true that could have happened
if neighborhood isn’t pure then from our pov it’s a 50/50 shot on the others
way better odds than firing randomly off d1 reads
1 Like
ok youre a real one, keep up the agenda
zone also said the game is more standard.
I’m more curious as to why none of the other two claimed it first given they’re presumably also immune to anticlaim?
1 Like
i wish
1 Like
I like neutrals, but I haven’t really been stabbed in the back by one yet (I expect to be in the vast minority)
probably bc they don’t believe me
but like come on if neighbors weren’t immune to anticlaim 1 wolf could just out the hood and instakill two people
is this a policy thing or a setup read on the neutral being anti-town
i assume all anti claims are instant ninja ITAs until proven otherwise
the wording makes it seem like the anticlaim is not a kill. (& also definitely not multiple kills per night)
1 Like
in the last april showers game, the anticlaim was dependent on the player being anticlaimed making the posts about their claim, I think
im usigng a keyboard and mouse and it feels so good to type more stuff the feedback loop of clicking is addicting
reads soon
1 Like
and also like a roleblock or something
i’m gonna be real i didn’t read the rules very closely so true
ok gtg back in like an hour and a half
1 Like
it fills me with joy to kill neutrals
has stuck with me since the tos days
2 Likes