No matter how much you don’t care or convince yourself you don’t carw about pain, eventually your body will physically give out
1 Like
this is somehow both incredibly singeresque and not singeresque at all
1 Like
the more people are involved the more likely one of them is to be disabled
1 Like
That’s literally irrelevant. It’s just asking if the scale changes things
1 Like
Let’s uh, make the questiob better.
Assume that helping people means disabled people can walk, while the hurt people can no longer walk.
1 Like
Like it’s very possible that the 10k could be more valuable to me than the 100k but I don’t know. I will never make a decision based on population alone. Not even a billion to one
2 Likes
i dont see how its irrelevant? if the hurt is like “people are seveerly distraught by what happens” i would probably say no, if the hurt is like “they are inconvienced or things arent optimal but they’ll be fine” i’d probably say yes
literally haven’t read a word in this conversation since the trolley was mentioned
3 Likes
this makes it harder
1 Like
“Is it equally as bad to give 10 people $10 and kill 1 person’s family as it is to give 100,000 people $10 and kill 10,000 people’s family” and you can sub in whatever extrema you want
1 Like
do we pick and choose who gets helped and hurt
nope, completely random I think that is only fair?
1 Like
yeah I think N.1 works for the SCP Foundation
im trusting arete to make sure things don’t stray into politics and stuff but arete is probably the exact mod i should not trust for this
6 Likes
The question is whether the scale changes things? Not whether it’s good or bad?
1 Like
buuuut also the question is still asking just about whether the proportions make a difference, rather than the actual answer
so no, it still makes no difference
your goat’s a singer stan
1 Like
you know me so well
5 Likes
How many would use the legs to run instead of just walking? And what is the taxpayer expense incurred for all those wheelchairs
these questions aren’t poltiical
2 Likes