no, you are obligated either way
yes
technically everyoneâs like a 20th cousin or whatever the fuck
ooo
but the answerâs no
No, either way ur saving a life, just bc its family doesnt mean it is worth more than another
I would rather buy a hungry homeless some food, than give money to anyone I donât know.
arete was first but why
Absolutely not i put zero stock in blood only chemistry and shared interests
much lower chance of complications if you get organ transplant from ppl related to you
my brother would have so much to say about this 
Ive done it before i felt sick
I still died bc i missed my shots but they turned around
this is consistent with your world view yeh i get why
i agree it doesnât really change i dont even know my cousins well
i think yes. i wouldnt do it for anyone though, maybe only my mom. id rather have guilt and keep my kidney
i donât even have any first cousins lmao. i ainât devoting my kidney to someone whoâs at best imaginary and at worst a scammer
oh thats true
i may do it for money reasons
does that make me a bad person
probably
but also
i have a kidney
i like having two
i need compensation for giving up one
nothing bad ever happened to me for having two kidenies
I prob wouldnt donate my kidney but only bc kidney & liver problems run in my family so thatd prob be a bad idea
I was best friends with my cousin for a good part of last year, but then he exploded at me
so i in fact have LESS obligation to donate my kidney to a cousin
yeah, something along those lines
also my attitude towards donating to charity, like as point of fact I donât donate my entire discretionary budget to charity but I do set a minimum percentage and donate at minimum that much [to charities that Iâve done more than 15 seconds of research about, before anyone raises the âwhat if youâre getting scammedâ objection]