You cannot be sad about it. If I were to be sad about it I would never not be sad. Match my tone. If I bring something up casually then I desire for you to treat it casually.
philosophers have some kind of brainworm i think. they are incapable of approaching certain topics like a normal human
1 Like
Are your moral obligations to people in your own country or community stronger than those to people in other countries and communities (assuming no unusual circumstances - for example, suffering because of famine - in either your own country/community or other countries/communities)?
Yes
No
hey i recognize this excerpt from famine, affluence, and morality
1 Like
you can’t trick me peter singer
1 Like
no
1 Like
Everybody in this world is me. Morality is easy
1 Like
no
i mean
it depends on the specific disability/illness
like I absolutely want to not be fatally allergic to nuts (i’m aware not everyone considers this a disability per se but it illustrates my point)
i thinm the answer is obviousyl no yeah
yes
1 Like
the answer’s no but i don’t feel like agreeing with peter singer
oh?
My point is not that disability is desirable or even neutral but that there is no point in wanting otherwise because it will never achieve anything
1 Like
I would rather care about people I know, then people I dont
1 Like
thats fair
1 Like
Define country define community
I’d rather die than join america’s military because i resent the country’s values, but i’d gladly put my life on the line for the environment, or to improve sales at my job
1 Like
reversed stupidity is not intelligence (if you agree with this then you are agreeing with someone even more annoying than Peter Singer) (but also it is true so)
what why
1 Like