Cookie Thread Act 3: The Cookie Strikes Back

i am sorry but only cats can be involved in schroedinger’s question

1 Like

is this leading to where i think it is

also NO

1 Like

No.
Not really.

1 Like

PROBABLY LEADING TO CANNIBAL STUFF

i was thinking it would be about homophobia

:joy_cat:

that being said, if you believe morality is subjective, yes is probably closer to the truth if only because of arbitrariness. but no objective standards of morality can punish ideas that are a bit disgusting

it’s difficult for something to be morally reprehensible for something that affects you and only you

The answer is no and I fucking hate when people imply otherwise and I will kill them all badly

2 Likes

my sister hates the smell of bananas and i consider it morally correct to regularly eat bananas in her presence

1 Like

Popular opinion is usually nonsensical to me
There is no reason jaywalking should be illegal if you’re fast and assertive enough

1 Like

oh fuck that

1 Like

Question 3: Can an action be morally wrong if the only person (or people) harmed by it is the person (or people) undertaking the action? For example, could it be morally wrong to smoke if it is true that nobody except the smoker is harmed? (There are two things you should bear in mind here. First, if you respond “No” it will also be assumed that you do not think an action can be morally wrong if nobody at all is harmed by it. Second, for the purposes of this activity, you should assume that every action that aims at doing harm, or which carries the reasonable expectation of causing harm, actually causes harm; in other words, don’t answer ‘Yes’ just because you think the assassin who fails in an attempt to kill her target - and thereby causes no actual harm - has nevertheless behaved immorally).

Yes
No

it depends if you eat porridge infront of other people or not, the amount of the population that thinks its disgusting, the reasoning behind eating the porridge (which is just to because people thing its disgusting)
doing things that displeases others solely to displease others with no gain is morally bad, i think

1 Like

I have run hundreds upon hundreds of red lights

1 Like

tempted to skip these questions for the cat ones but
uh
may mess with quiz results

the question writer has never heard of secondhand smoke

3 Likes

god these moral philosophy questions remind me of my ex

1 Like

smoking does hurt other people what

does anyone actually find the idea of eating porridge disgusting? id hope not, they’d be very spoiled

1 Like