I like how rachel doesn’t realize that all the cookie thread posters are me on different accounts. Dont believe me? watch me post this on my other accounts
3 Likes
I like how rachel doesn’t realize that all the cookie thread posters are me on different accounts. Dont believe me? watch me post this on my other accounts
2 Likes
I like how rachel doesn’t realize that all the cookie thread posters are me on different accounts. Dont believe me? watch me post this on my other accounts
2 Likes
It makes no difference…
1 Like
its a drowning kid in a shallow pond tbf
I like how rachel doesn’t realize that all the cookie thread posters are me on different accounts. Dont believe me? watch me LIKE THIS POST on my other accounts
1 Like
You don’t realize that I joined this forum like 4 years ago, and know half the people posting here
1 Like
it’s true rachel knows me
Let me clarify i need both but i need my relationships from work more. Physical exhilaration is free i can go run 50+ miles whenever I want. I need my job for mental and emotional exhilaration
1 Like
The Drowning Child
Good, that is surely the right choice. It is hard to think that possession of a battered old bike could trump the life of a child in a moral calculus.
Multiple Rescues
Now let’s imagine that this is not the first time you’ve come across a child strugging in an expanse of water and seemingly at risk of drowning. In fact, only last week on your way home from work you heard cries as you passed by a local reservoir and when you investigated you found that a young boy had fallen in and was struggling to drag himself out. Happily, he was quite near to dry land, so you were able to reach into the water and pull him out, albeit you did ruin your work shirt in the process.
Does the fact you saved a child’s life last week mean you’re not obliged to go ahead with the rescue this week?
It makes no difference that I saved a child’s life last week, I’m still obliged to go ahead with the rescue this week.
It does makes a difference that I saved another child’s life last week. I’m not obliged to go ahead with the rescue this week.
wonder what would happen if we said no to any one of these
DROWNING CHILDREN CITY
1 Like
STILL OBLIGATED
1 Like
the second option is evilmaxxing. one rescue per month quota sorry kid
2 Likes
do you accept lying to all your coworkers that you valued your job more then someone elses life, or do you tell them and potentinally ruin relationships
Morally obligated to fund guardrails on this lake or something
1 Like
after the fifth child i would probably start looking for the child drowner
1 Like
these questions are easy, just save the kid. I’m sure this will have no troubling implications later on in the quiz
2 Likes
HE ALMOST BEAT YOU
YOU ARE DOING GREAT ARETE
What is the basis to any moral obligation?
Isn’t is entirely subjective?
Can an obligation ever be subjective?