tell this to physicscels PLEASE
yes i get that your funkonewton altrocks velocitate at the speed of pi or whatever but energy is not real and you cannot prove that to me
Oh fair
You have pretty interesting takes
ici takes go hard as hell i cant lie

Of course you need a 2nd conglomerate to analyze the entire 1st conglomerate
?
okay, sure, a single human could never comb through the data points, and iâm not suggesting we donât utilise machines to help in data analysis, Iâm not that much of a luddite, but, like
sure, a single guy couldnât do it, but that doesnât mean we have to immediately turn to the machine thatâs fueled by spying on literally everyone that we donât understand in order to try to⌠understand itself
something something all experience is ultimately derived from the senses and the senses can be flawed so we canât truly know anything blah blah blah
all discourse is philosophyposting in a trenchcoat
so we should stop trying to know anything and become village people
correct interpretation
a trenchcoat? i didnt think we were hiding it
certainly, weâd need a model of a similar scale to a deep learning neural net to meaningfully analyse a deep learning neural net. that doesnât mean we need another fucking neural net
my most enjoyable method of talking is to pretend to be an ancient philospher and take everything seriously no matter how unhinged it is. Who wants to define what a social deduction game is with me again
Im just wondering what you think is able to analyze at that scale
something that actually fucking works instead of racist clippy
socrates was so fucking annoying the athenians did nothing wrong
Noting this for my philio class
Wouldnât you just want a better neural net to analyze the other?
I think we should construct some kind of meta perfect crab to analyse all crabs off of