@whatdafucc why’d you like this post specifically? owo
thread is boring im actually gonna read emberdark for a bit
Not catbae has a habit of dying n1 as town
I’m pretty sure they’re town by their first few posts but I don’t think they have good reads
What did i just typed
Just had a short circuit
so is that like a strong meta read im a lil confused from this post?
Mew :(
nothing super strong no
no it’s a weak meta read
im mad
Everytime i play 2r1b i go away understanding it less
heya gira owo
anything interesting happen while event people were out owo?
Hi mad im dad
ok thats kinda what i understood it to be but i still wasn’t sure how much its like, dictating ur read of cape
i think we may have slightly lost at rand owo
why did you keep softing president after i claimed president and amelia was obviously the spy!!
They just seem super uninformed @Gocj. This feels like they’re more lost in thread as opposed towards like struggling with reads and stuff, and I like their - little, but sizable - contributions.
Chloe does feel like she’s playing this up a bit.
I also think that this is towny from Pqwerty @Gocj @Spookycat27 @Apocryphal
dw krii just sheep my reads I read everything
But pls fix the wrong ones
Seperate post to respond to Elixer. I find it laughable that you cherry pick 3 posts in my ISO to call me out for being vague.
I don’t know who or else I would’ve said so.
Most of their reads tbh, they feel like they’re fluff posting while also trying to project something
The thought does end there though. I don’t remember the interactions, hence the post. It’s not meta.
Frankly speaking you picked out 3 posts that you described as “vague” but only 1/3 of them is actually vague, and even then it’s just unexplained. The thought and the reason for it is there.
Furthermore,
This is insane. I directly called Soweii wolfy, and I don’t “fear” calling Selkie wolfy. Infact, I did call them wolfy - directly. I’ve called chloe wolfy 50 times and they’re a much more active poster. This is also the only post you bring up that falls under this scrutiny when you mention most of their reads. You bring up 3 and a half reads when I have over 30 atp.
“Most of their reads are” when you pick 3 reads from my ISO and only 1/4 of those actually profess to the categories you claim they fall under.
@Catbae on that note, how was this post towny? It looked like a pos to me You explained later. I dislike the content of the post irregardless but I guess it can be towny from that perspective.