FAM5 - Thread 2 - Day 2

Forum Games FAM5
#6376

I mean i was on good time. Just fucked up one word

1 Like
#6377

I think you were never going to make it in 2 minutes

#6378

fuck missed the eurofriendly event

#6379

Nuh uh

#6380

alrighty i am up owo

nice kill on ratchet, we need 2-3 more wolves dead if we can owo

i realize mist was in charge of shots and directed kelsier but i would propose childe for ita3 owo

glgl owo

1 Like
#6381

Luka has recieved a cookie :cookie:

6 Likes
FAM5 - Thread 3 - Day 2
FAM5 - Thread 1 - Day 1
#6382

Who keeps giving this fuck cookies

4 Likes
#6383

2 Likes
#6384

smh this is a capitalist mash the ones with cookies keep getting more cookies

#6385

@Luka be generous and share some w us

#6386

Yo, good morning yall.
Turns out that sometimes a few hours of sleep can happen when you decide to go back to sleep several times.

I saw the bits about timing with regards to claiming Miller and I don’t think it’s necessarily important to claim miller right away, similarly to what Chloe had said earlier on. It could be better to just wait with that sort of information until you know you’ve been checked, the timing is a bit weird considering conversation didn’t really suggest this had happened? But shrug/

#6387

@Wisdom why are you concerned about wagonomics in a mash of all games?

#6388

we dont the wolves did nothing bad

#6389

there is no proof that the wolves have done anything malicious

#6390

Will you be around ITA3? I need some help w my shot later

#6391

isnt ephemera from singapore or some place like that or am i mixing them with someone

force them to sleep

#6392

oh rip

I translated the “i just got up” as just waking up

need someone else to sheep then.

@bystander who should I vote?

#6393

also idk about what player this is (bless mech tracking people tbh) but I dont agree with this sentiment. Claiming negative util in your role is important to do before it is “needed”, so people cant chalk it up to a reaction to being red-checked.

#6394

Scrolling through bys’ ISO

good post, bys wanting to be ITAd effectively wastes ITAs.

not a good post? Doesn’t try to protect bys while appealing to them.

tbh if nutella/bys are v/v then of course this is forgiven

I dont like bys’ progression of posts about her role after she votes Nutella. Too much to quote, but walking back/moving goalposts of a claim feels very iffy. Agreeing to “kill nutella then because im guarantweed town” in p#4979 before selfvoting in p#5146 is a wild read.

#6395

Considering that tutuu tries to gather support on voting Retro early this day, maybe not