The underlined. Where and how did i prompt you here? Youre now saying something different. Unless i still dont understand you. Im a bit tired. Let me read again
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on approaching this game? I remember when we played together in beatings 4 you were more content to probe people’s thoughts and play more of a facilitative role instead of focusing on making yourself towny
is saying “you don’t know what youre talking about because this is with little game knowledge of me” not prompting me to gain more game knowledge of you. am i supposed to just go “yep” and abandon the read and move on or what
okay people are gonna be weird about how id ask this in scum chat if we were w/w. no i would not. we are talking in thread i ask it in thread. do not go down that avenue
Weird post but i assume im missing context; much in the same way i assume im missing context on hippo not being very wolfy is he actually the fabled (bad d1, better future days) player
Okay i think we can reach communication. Im still very suspicious of you but i no longer think youre speaking completely inexplicable things
Yes, it wasnt a direct prompt. I was reminding you that when making data research you should use a sample size N>1. N=1 is just bad. For example if you were gathering statistics on how many arms a human has on average, and you were using sample size of N=1, if you survey a one-armed person you reach the conclusion “on average, humans have 1 arms”
This isnt a specific thing about you. SO many mafia players do it. Extremely common
I dont want to tell other ppl what methodology to use to form reads. Mafia is such an open-ended game. You form reads in countless ways
I was reminding you, yes and asking you to recalibrate. I wasnt telling you “jaiden, you MUST read all of my games in order to read me”. I was reminding you that, if you were trying to use meta to read me (which u were), it would be more accurate to use a bigger sample size. You dont HAVE to read me via meta, read me however u want, but if u wanan use meta, its better to have more data. And from there on, if you happen to agree with my argument, you can read me using any methodology you want. Read me via gut, read my tone, do some analysis stuff, w/e
Im not prompting you. Im implicitly / indirectly prompting you, if you wanna define it that way. Is the onus not on you? “Do i want to readjust, or no”. Im not difectly telling you “jaiden, you must readjust, this is a command”. Thats how i see me prompting somebody
Yes, u could say that was my intent, yes, i think its correct for me to communicate to u