it means the central pr can kill you
Duke can sentence players to death before being able to kill them. From what I understand, we are missing the N1 sentence.
uh well then. i would be sad but objectively town pr might want to kill me even if iām currently townsiding, so. w/e
also before the election ended i got a message telling me to vote daeron for king (i did not follow through)
I did not kill Meme so thatās got me quite confused
Well
Not anymore but still
You what
Wait⦠If you were sentenced at N1, thenā¦
ā¦Arbalist or Baronet?
Duke can sentence D1
Arcanist can kill N1
Thatās it
Converts into The Archer or The Duelist
Converts into The Archer or The Duelist
Wait. Arbalist canāt even kill at N1 since theyād have to set up their Aim.
And since catbae was sentenced at N1, the only role that couldāve killed MKP⦠should be just Baronet, no?
Huh⦠I suppose Arcanist couldāve also killed MKP.
@Daeron
Itās time to update your worlds.
- Chomps flipped Herbalist.
- catbae claims to have been sentenced at N1.
- Arcanist could have used their 1S abil to kill at N1.
I am here now
I suspect the world is now that both MKP and Amelia were Unseen and Amelia was Page/Astrologer
Also Willow probably is actually Baronet
@Zone_Q11 and @Kelsier need to justify their scumread on me
It was Arcanist, evidently
Which I had missed because I thought it was a misspelling of Arbalist
Also Kelsier suggesting that he might use the death card before someone gets a chance to claim duke/marshal is a very bad look
Now to figure out who catbae got a message from
???
You⦠do realize we are playing Virtuous, right?
AKA, the setup where Unseen = uninformed majority?
Correct. That is what she claimed, though she claims to not have killed MKP.
Not sure why youād think Kelsier scumreads you, but Iām taking you accountable for pushing Chomps.
I am planning to kill you while fully aware of being a hypocrite, because (1) I should have added Willow in my list of accountability, and (2) you three should all have been pardoned because while killing Chomps is mechanically the worst choice possible, socially it makes the most sense to get rid of the one whose claim brings forth paranoia issues.
It would be absolutely hilarious if the other neutral is a Viscount
I mean yes I hardpushed Chomps but that doesnāt mean that it was a bad kill because the slot needed solved realistically