Yeah, John likely to be a villager and since he’s proletting me win, voting with him. VOTE: Sabrina
JohnLFOL (2): KandeLFOL, NevermoreLFOL
McBrainsLFOL (2): Lupin, WarlockLFOL
SabrinaLFOL (2): JohnLFOL, McBrainsLFOL
PlaguebearerLFOL (1): JackieLFOL
WarlockLFOL (1): NikkiLFOL
Not Voting (7): SabrinaLFOL, WhiteWitchLFOL, Catherine, WidowLFOL, HelsingLFOL, PlaguebearerLFOL, GraveDiggerLFOL
I think the fact that you posted that wall is good @JohnLFOL
But I am not a fan of the fact that you’re attempting to paint me as a possible unseen who’s trying to skirt by on the misregistration thing. And I myself looked into forms of misregistration for this purpose, yet you neglected to mention that detail which makes me want to say you’re pushing agenda. It could just be that you’re good and for some reason decided to ignore that truth but I find it frustrating.
I will point out some more points, the only class which has a timed misregistration limit is The Mastermind. And that class doesn’t suggest it can register as a different class type than it is. So I’d think it would appear as a Blue Dragon, Special.
So unless you want to argue I am exactly The Mastermind, your comment on me asking to be investigated and that being suspicious due to misregistration is irrelevant.
In hindsight the point is kinda nothing. But at the time I was just reading all of the posts and I simply missed it. But I think I’m more confident on the Sabrina read. But at this point what other thing do we have to based off of besides the king check. Since I didn’t see anyone else having some information about a player. Though I guess they don’t want to perish.
Investigative classes should only really come out if they think they have something decently incriminating. Or if they can clear someone when it is vital do so.
It’s useful if we have have some information that directs our attention to certain places but I am afraid that it could cause us to lose information if we are careless with this.
I guess what I’m saying in that last post is that I trust our investigatives to come out with relevant information when they believe it is wise to do so. I don’t have enough experience to really try and argue one way or another. When I’m a seer or sheriff in among us I have to wait until I am confident about timing before I act on things.
A seer or sheriff in ToS 2 should be posting their will every d as y.
Why don’t you? Why are you so sure I’m not the observer who doesn’t want the neut that can ruin my game dead?
It was hard to say exactly but the thing is the vibe you gave off during that conversation just saw the nuet as an easy push if you are evil. I can understand the logic behind it if you are good but the vibe was not there in my eyes. Something there felt opportunistic compared to the other anti-nuet party of them explaining why they want McBrains should meet their McEnd.
Please let me McWin instead me meeting my McEnd. Giggles
And I’m sorry I have to bring this up specifically. This “Limited resource” we have has very big caveats attached. You are firstly assuming the king is good. You are then assuming they won’t miss with this ability. And if they do hit, they don’t hit an evil that happened to have royal blood. The starting king is not a confirmed good player - but they can make certain choices and perform certain actions that make them much more likely to be good than evil. They claimed to cop check a specific slot as evil - only the Good king can cop check from what I can tell the rest of the evil kings don’t seem to have cop abilities unless they’re that one king that can take a random ability? We’re also forgetting that the king slot is replenishable, ironically enough we do actually get more charges of king-based abilities if the starting king dies and we get another one. If the king is willing to kill someone they cop checked as non-BD without hestitation then I’d be much more inclined to believe they are good, meaning that evils have to waste a kill getting rid of them…and at that point we’d have another good king ready step…
Oh, I know who you are now. 
Sabrina is an excellant choice for Jackie’s execution ability I feel. A good king would not want to waste their one shot exe ability on a neutral, especially when that neut plans on helping the town.
I don’t believe in limited resources being valuable and I don’t believe in them being holstered is a good thing for town in a game where conversion exists. If you are not willing at any point in time to instantly prove your allegiance even if it is with a limited use ability then I can and will assume you are holding onto it so you can play for evil later down the line.
It’s a struggle for me to believe we had 2 starting good kings both with the ability to kill and both with the ability to hard cop check every night. If we have that powerful a start then I’m worried on the macro scale what’s going on with what the evils have.
Give me 12 hours and then I’ll revisit your case.
It means you could be faking this, there’s no other explanation than that
sorry no, maybe i’ll think of something later
No that’s not true, Jackie outed you for being non-BD, role is irrelevant.
The thing is im willing to believe the two kings is because one of them got killed in the night. Meaning the unseen saw the threat possibility and decided to attempt to get rid of one. But based on someone hypothetical role list that they have made based on claims and deaths. 7 roles we know are possibly in play with 2 of them dead ish. That being king and bodyswapper. We also know evil can probably kill since nobody took kill credit for the king. Plus mastermind is the unseen leader meaning my assumption of the list is that we may have a lack of investigation and have to go off basically little to no checks in the late game.