you are so behind
whatever
I’m talking about 100% of the time in this game anyways
either way it is a good idea to get a check on the town leader who no one will replace imo
if this is the last loop then so be it, i think you are scum anyways, but
… that’s not a very good metric
i think the strongest social case against jarek is that if he’s wolf, they really did not know there was going to be a loop and they’re mildly peeved / checked out as a result
i can’t be bothered to figure out whether innocent child is a double, triple or quadruple bluff by the GM i don’t caaaaare
to be honest “innocent child” doesnt mean shit
i say this because i totally act like this when im wolf and feeling robbed
in hindsight i agree
but lets be real the 3-poster going to 0 posts is infinitely more likely than a blackmailer
it didnt even say town innocent child im gonna cry
okay now we’re just going in circles
to be fair to jarek
my rolecard doesn’t say town anywhere either
yeah because you’re assuming i should have made massive leaps in logic that literally nobody could have made except you
i think the massive leap in logic is Killing The Greenchecked Player
I’m not strictly against wagoning jarek
tbh I think hippo’s case was ~weak but dia’s bit about him being peeved and put off aligns really well with my own issue with jarek falling off hard after the reset
however
im still not in love with the idea of doing an ic on d2
and
more importantly
i still think chomps was a hit and idk if jarek as IC drops a vote on a partner like that
I’d do it again
genuinely the number one reason i trust leafia is that she takes every claim deadly serious even the ones that are obvious jokes. we had basically this exact same convo but with an inverse role on d1 last loop
also your greencheck is only slightly more valid than jarek’s anyways lel
ftr i do not expect this would change based on her alignment
i’ve kind of just accepted that if leafia is mafia vig with the posting history she does i’m just owned and was throwing from the start