Millennium Theory - Act 1, Scene 2 (16/17)

[Hazardwaste]

I mean in my defence i said i was going to be lacking activity lol.

I think your top 4 town are fine maybe ishmael down one, if you want my PoV.

I would probably honestly drop geewa down to -1 just due to their reaction from daeron voting them

[iamagummybear]

If this is a doubt on Ranta’s claim, I thought she was FPSing until she knew what the name of the 3ps were. I don’t know if Ranta would read the OP that thoroughly.

[iamagummybear]

If this is a doubt on Ranta’s claim, I thought she was FPSing until she knew what the name of the 3ps were. I don’t know if Ranta would read the OP that thoroughly.

[diafiasco]

@Frostwolf103

If not yourself, who would you give mind boggle?

probably whoever i wanted to kill d1 to flush the ability

[Hazardwaste]

@Hazardwaste

I mean in my defence i said i was going to be lacking activity lol.

Placement > Game

I want to pass my final assessment lol

[tutuu]

@Arctic @ElizaThePsycho (messed up pinging willow earlier)

[diafiasco]

@tutuu

I can out a member of the mafia by giving them my abilities. They are forced to take my abilities (if i win the event).

are they forced to use your ability though

[tutuu]

They aren’t. Still outing. Youre missing something

[diafiasco]

additionally, if i’m understanding the anticlaim correctly, if you don’t act tonight (which is fine since the redcheck is tied to your ability, rather than the one you receive) the wolves cannot score more than one point against you, even if you claim your ability

[tutuu]

Let me reread it because i got rly spooked by it i thought they could get more

[iamagummybear]

This might be crackpot, but the ability // private voting reminds me of those mash abilities where it’s a fake town ability and they get a list of the distribution of the votes.

[Frostwolf103]

You uh…

Sigh

[diafiasco]

@Stage_Fright

Gain a point for each of the statements below that are true. This ability fails against any target who is not an Anomaly.

1. The post quoted contains a true-claim of one of their abilities
2. They are attempting to use an ability of the specified category tonight
3. They target the second player tonight with one of their abilities

Then, tonight, spend the points to do the following:

1 Point - Learn their danger level, breach risk level, and recommended Counter-Breach Protocol
2 Points - Choose to either roleblock or rolestop them
3 Points - Choose to either kill them (bypassing everything) or permanently vanillaize them

I read this as

I say “I’m a cop”, you can score up to 2 points against me, which means I can’t act

I say “I’m a cop I’m checking Tutuu”, you can kill me

Importantly, if I were to win and trade abilities, I wouldn’t even be cop anymore, which makes #1 retroactively false

[Zone_Q11]

@Geewa

ranta’s claim is almost certainly bullshit and there is no reason to be entertaining it as serious

That is a valid opinion.
My opinion differs from yours.

@Geewa

also that is a bad vote by tutuu

@Geewa

“hey lolz let’s chop the 3p claim because antitown so i don’t have to take responsibility for any pushes”

I stated this before, but even though I trust in Ranta’s claim, it is unfortunately also “not bad” to execute her considering it’s impossible to assure everyone that she will side with Town.

…again, I am a pessimist, but it seems like you are looking at things way further ahead than me, because I didn’t even realize that he could use Ranta to push votes away from himself.

@tutuu

If u guys want to make it very difficult for w!tutuu to win, how can you win with v!tutuu if you choose to call me mafia straight from the go? Because im advocating to be voted for a ~NAI neutral mech event, tha the hosts even TOLD you “woves win and lose nothing if elected”

I did not call you Mafia from the start. I only started saying it after you said “execute me if I say either of those” in response to Arctic’s “What if you get roleblocked or [something else]?” (See P#373.)

@tutuu

How are you comparing this to Wiretapper 13er,

I did not do this, and Geewa already covered you about this matter in P#453.

@CRYBABY_UNDERDOG

Why did you feel the need to respond to a question that wasn’t directed to you if you didn’t even fully read the topic of discussion

Because I was invested in the discussion. (For once, I am interested in something unrelated to me. Why wouldn’t I talk about it?)

[May]

Treat ranta as fpsing probably I wont claim to know all Atlas’s design philosophy but this seems <rand hers

[May]

The massive swing in alignments on N1 based off stupid bullshit that isnt necessarily gonna be claimed is hash tag bad

[May]

Imagine u can get a 4th or 5th wolf. Basically arbitrarily. Based off of little input from the wolfteam. Inagine having to balance around that

[tutuu]

Okay its less scary than i thought. Also they can only use it on me which is good, i thought they could roleblock other people even though i claim, i misread heavily

I have 2 abilities that are loud, passive, and public

I have 0 active abilities

If a wolf receives my passive abilties, they would get outed as mafia imo, sans crazy stuff, or wolves having an ability that lets them further erase or swap abilities, on top of the mind boggle, and i dont have control over that if they do. Thats why i characteized it as a soft red check

[iamagummybear]

She did know the name of the 3ps. Do you think Ranta would read the OP closely? That’s the only reason I am having trouble reading her as FPSing.

[May]

Yes she absolutely could and you’re getting fixated on one detail. She even coulda read it in response to your question