walk me through this for a minute: did you legitimately believe that a player would get an night 0 investigation, that turned up guilty, and that it should be trusted in a bastard game?
i only skimmed parts of your wall but you seemed to like T3 outside of that, do you have an opinion on his posts after the beginning of the game and when the supposed check was outed?
sounds typical
yea prob
hippo prob town, i don’t really think reading into the flavor of a role reveal in a game like this is wise, but i can follow he train of thought and don’t think it’s an angle he taes here as scum, and miller claims IME are >and town
effort not alignment indicative imo, i haven’t really read over the whole thing, but i am pretty *mrr* at his vote ending up where it did
UNVOTE Jarek
i’ll put my vote somewhere else but pretty decent post
what
nvm this is bad and wolfy
VOTE: jarek
You’re not super evil but of high posters youre worst. Theres a decent amount of waffle looking like ur trying to be helpful and i havent agreed with a chunk of it (apart from carbonated vote which is 
)
And i dont like some of your “this is sus of me” posts.
If theres 199 believers i was one of them tçif there was 1 i was that one
hmm yes time to settle this definite for real difference check on day 1, then we can kill someone tomorrow, i’m not trying to chain miselims why do you ask
Actually a bad idea now that i think abt it lul
Even with a fake redcheck tho frost didnt pursue the guy enough is what i felt from isoing
I nuke the owner of this post
@Altina explain to me what you’re seeing in jarek because i feel like his play around the dumb fake check is p bad and the way he walked it back feels like hasty ass-covering
I guess
i mean, i dunno, do you expect him to pursue it that strongly
it depends a lot on the player archetype imo but i do think a lot of the reactions to it were overly credulous
