Odyssey to the Fortress of Lunacy - Day 4 (12/28)

[Ruby]

Mentioned before Day 1 was bad for me I’ll be able to post more and read fully on weekend

[Ruby]

Me and gummy were in a hood in FAM where I cleared her for a few posts.

I was wrong

[Altina]

i will be eagerly awaiting

[Prophylaxis]

@iamagummybear

Yeah Wazza mentioned in Fam5 wolfchat that as town they sit in a corner and poke at stuff or something wheras when they wolf it is the complete opposite regarding thread control

@iamagummybear

Er I didn’t think so- they’ve veen in-between the poking at things and powerwolfing with all the thread control in the world here, but I think they are closer to the former than the latter, at least. I think if what they said was true in Fam5, their alignment will become very clear pretty soon.

Okay. Worth noting that Wazza is very much well aware of her playstyle and can intentionally juke things up after FAM 5.

How did they play in that game, btw? I saw Wazza and you both endgamed as a wolf.

@Altina

im not convinced Jarek is that townie anymore, but also my read was based a lot on my perception of them. Jarek once he had his transformation arc, had this holier than thou tone when he was town, like he would just kinda post what he felt like, and kinda just ignore the thread as a whole. I didnt have problems with their earlier posting because of that perception of them, but like their vote on u still felt slimy. that kinda omgusy reaction is something I think is more likely to come from wolf!jarek

FWIW, Jarek is OMGUSing catbae, not me.

I’ll dedicate some time overnight to looking at him and Hazardwaste then.

[Frostwolf103]

@Jarek

People are acting like this kind of information on N0 is taboo but I don’t get it.

It usually has a drawback if that’s allowed and I have seen N0 checks before.

@Jarek

My question is do you think I’m going to jump into thread without consulting my teammates that I’d have and just decide to believe a redcheck that was obviously fake since I’d know who my teammates are? I suppose that implies in this world term wouldn’t be a teammate - if they are though, they’d surely have mentioned this fake check in the wolf chat and I’d have noticed. Weird line of thinking I might get called wolfy for having but I’m trying to figure this one out

It had to be unexpected, whether to believe the check is not relevant of the bait I lay on, it’s about the interest on T3 and how they respond.

Are you asking if I know you respond to the redcheck the way I intended, then I would have overestimated my play.

@Jarek

Catbae had reasonable suspicion on me (in their opinion, with the games they play ) because I kinda just full send believed a redcheck

@Frostwolf103

So I think, that’s as far I got anyways

You also believed Gummy’s thing with T3 and Hazard?

[Hazardwaste]

VOTE: Ash
I am going to bed so i wont be able to change off this vote, i did like their read on kelsier it felt like it had some townie thought process behind it. but everything else is just kinda mild at best and overly performative at worse

day closes in 4 and we still have way too many wagons for the damsel ability.
Town needs to work to not create multiple wagons specifically today. the less people we have on the top wagon what ever the majority of you decide it to be the worse it will be. i understand the notion that it could be a fake ability but i dont think anyone should want to risk an instant loose.
and if you are the main wagon, if you dont see yourself getting off the block in like the last minute of the day vote yourself. i have clarified with the hosts that you will be added to the rand if you are town in turn removing the ability from the game and confirming if its real or not if town gets lucky.

[Wazza]

It’s definitely relevant to note that in mentioning this playstyle to Gummy, I also did want to make it clear that I’m basically like a Regigigas and don’t really do much until D2, it’s like I’ve got slow start, you can go through any of my past games and see this, only rare few times I’ve not done that

It’s also been more than long enough that not even I know if that’s true or not but I’ve not felt like doing much and I’m trying to get a feel for the game

I just don’t like Altina’s posting and I’m more than willing to call them out on it

[Wazza]

@Altina

@iamagummybear
so this is wolf wazza then?

I also don’t like how this is what they got from it

Feel like they’re itching to vote me and avoid it being called OMGUS or something

[Wazza]

Idk maybe I’m funneled but Altina’s posts just feel completely bad and I don’t like any of them

[Hazardwaste]

@Prophylaxis

I’ll dedicate some time overnight to looking at him and Hazardwaste then.

Goodluck.

@Frostwolf103

You also believed Gummy’s thing with T3 and Hazard?

i will state without out right claiming i could see a connection but it would need to be something specific

[Altina]

oops ya, catbae is who i meant

[Lord_Archibald_Curst]

Vote Count

---

Ash (7): Litten, catbae, May, tutuu, Hippopablompoyeetus, Prophylaxis, Hazardwaste
Memekingpizza (3): Frostwolf103, O.kazo, Chomps
O.kazo (3): Rue, Jarek, snowe
Altina (2): T3RMINATOR, Wazza
T3RMINATOR (2): Cattail_5.0, Memekingpizza
Frostwolf103 (1): Kelsier

Not Voting (9): Cattail_IV, iamagummybear, Liattac_VI, meowl, Relm, Ash, Ruby, pandora, Altina

[Wazza]

@Hazardwaste

day closes in 4 and we still have way too many wagons for the damsel ability.

can you explain this because maybe I’m missing something but I’m confused

[Hazardwaste]

@Wazza

can you explain this because maybe I’m missing something but I’m confused

@Lord_Archibald_Curst

Art of Transmutation (Night, Usable on Night 0):

Submit a negative utility ability of your choice.
After the end of the following day, one random Guest whose vote contributed to the elimination that day will receive all the abilities you created.
The description of Art of Transmutation , as well as of the first ability you submit with it, will be publicly announced.
The submitted abilities may be rejected if deemed too powerful or unfun by the hosts.

@Lord_Archibald_Curst

Mark of Annihilation (Passive):
If a player from an evil or a neutral faction publicly guesses that you have this passive, your faction will automatically lose. No faction can submit more than one guess this way.

this

[Hazardwaste]

in short the less amount of people on the elimination wagon. the more chance evil can just guess and insta win.

[iamagummybear]

They played extremely well. Were pretty much outed evil D2 and smooth-talked their way to victory.

[Wazza]

I know what this apparent damsel thing is, but I don’t get why you want less wagons or why that’s necessary

[Ash]

Uh…
I don’t feel like my posting is nearly as bad as others have made it out to be?

Like, I actively was trying to route conversation regarding Tutuu back on topic, I don’t think t!Tutuu was a read that came out of nowhere and was heavily implied by my approach to that wagon, my Gummy comment was a product of both me feeling that Tutuu was obviously town judging from threadstate and from Rue’s post noting that Gummy was just reiterating other people’s reads, and I dropped Liattac being Carbon after both Gummy and Carbon pointed out that it probably wasn’t.

[Hazardwaste]

cause less wagons mean more votes on less wagons rather then less votes on alot of wagons?

i am confused with the confusion

[Ash]

I will say that I can nullify the wagon on me today, but I really don’t wanna use that if I don’t have to.