Odyssey to the Fortress of Lunacy - Game Over - Conspirators Win!

[Prophylaxis]

Read this post of mine from this morning, it explains my progression on Memeking.

[Litten]

I think your box is too loose and too tight at the exact same time. Which is weird. Like, I still disagree with your assessment that meme posting improved and your wazza read was based off…one post?

[Litten]

You don’t need a small poe you just need to be confident in what you remove from it

[May]

I don’t townread Wazza for literally just the one quoted post and I don’t think Proph’s townread was just based off that either… I think Wazza is sitting there and poking, they’re not acting like they really WANT something specific, they’re acting likr they’re driven by something they spotted

[Litten]

Like can you explain how this post is actually townie? This post just feels like how meme mostly writes his posts in games. I don’t think it really is good looking for them

[May]

Wolf Wazza is fullll of agenda can’t resist agenda complete agenda. Town Wazza is pulled alongn by one string

[Prophylaxis]

Not really one post but I’m just trying to figure out if Wazza genuinely believes if her “catch” on Wisp is real. Because if that’s a real thought then she’s very likely town.

I think Memeking improved and I’m trusting sort of gummy’s meta read on him. My only qualm with him and Ash specifically is that when we’ve asked both to provide wolfreads they’ve been limp noodles.

[Litten]

If Jarek is a wolf they are going to be fuming in the thread tomorrow so keep that in mind. Probably. If I win. I probably win

[Prophylaxis]

I’ve never played with Memeking before, I don’t know how they normally post.

I liked the defense because he explained his mindset behind most of the issues I raised with him and I can see town!him approaching the thread in this manner. (Scrolling down beginning of game thread, reading early game posts that pinged him a little, him bringing up FAM 5 and how checks were real in that game).

[Jarek]

So like I’m genuinely curious what exactly is this going to do:

If you pick a townie?
If you pick a wolf?
If you pick a neutral?

[Litten]

@T3RMINATOR

i give my blessing to voting pandora, altina, memekingpizza, and jarek

Did this guy even read the posts of these people?

[Litten]

If you lose you will be forcibly removed from all private chats

[Jarek]

@Litten

If Jarek is a wolf they are going to be fuming in the thread tomorrow so keep that in mind. Probably. If I win. I probably win

This sounds like it just outs my alignment like an innocent child announcement, in which case why would I not just deliberately gamethrow

[Jarek]

gamethrow the MINIGAME MODS DON’T BAN MEEEEE

[Litten]

You can legally forfeit

[Frostwolf103]

@Prophylaxis

The vibe I’m getting the most out of his ISO is “laziness”.

Like, he tries to analyze people’s first posts rather than look at things that may be more alignment indicative, he immediately sees a N0 red check in a bastard game and defaults to believing it rather than look for wolves or produce a single behavioral wolfread on someone, when Litten asks him who he thinks the wolves are he goes “look at my points system”.

Is this just… gullible town that’s phoning it in, or a wolf, is what I’m asking myself. Right now, leaning towards the latter until he produces more readable content.

@Prophylaxis

Here’s a preliminary D1 readslist - roughly pertains to how I feel about the gamestate right now, nulls are not sorted.

@Prophylaxis

Memekingpizza

Lowest at bottom

@Prophylaxis

Memekingpizza: Not super interested in solving, poor reaction to getting pressured, weird trusting of the red check in a bastard game.

@Prophylaxis

Read this post of mine from this morning, it explains my progression on Memeking.

Really short on posts alone, but I can see the time here so you likely went to bed and by next morning you look up.

The first up is based on activity, not a great point to prove his innocence, it’s pretty annoying to get nitpicked from somebody of different timezone.

@Memekingpizza

Point 3: Coming from FAM5 we had someone claim a n0 green check and people believed it there. So it seems that people have seen N0 green checks/red checks happen in games so to say it’s a lie off the bat doesn’t seem right. If someone where to say they saw someone as good or evil and reports it on the spot we might as well talk about it. Plus with post restriction coming again from FAM5 there were things about post restrictions being in games so after seeing it first hand in that game might as well trust it.

@Prophylaxis

Can you give me some more context with the N0 green check in that game? It’s still a little weird to me that you immediately believed the N0 red check with Frostwolf, because 1) you know it’s a bastard game and 2) N0 red checks are god awful game design if they’re real (yay, you randed wolf. Someone caught you immediately because their role said so on Day 1 and you didn’t get to play)

I think it’s related to Atlas / Silviu which Silviu in return buddy up with Atlas which proven to be huge mistake in long run, but this point is what I heavily disagree with you here. He knows he was in wolf team at FAM5 and somehow he fallen to the same trick and act he got caught by this?

@Prophylaxis

I still want to see Memeking figure out who the wolves are but I actually like his defense towards me.

Felt too easy if you ask me.

[Jarek]

hmmm

depends on what the minigame that you’re doing to me is, I don’t care about the towncred of deliberately losing to prove I don’t have a chat I like minigames

[Litten]

we have to compliment each other and the best complimenter wins

[Jarek]

gg

[Litten]

It was a good match