Odyssey to the Fortress of Lunacy - Game Over - Conspirators Win!

VOTE: o.k

1 Like

An idea. Noe that we know the “Damsel” thing came from town, we can make the read that people that had an unlikely reaction to it could be mafia. Because they knew they didn’t do it, but they wanted to pretend they didn’t know mafia did it. To avoid showing TMI. I suspected catbae D1 for a reaction to the Damsel that I found unlikely

Catbae’s post there was insincere in my opinion. Like he’s pretending to clutch his pearls. Acting. Actor.

what damsel thing

Kelsiers ability and the public host announcement D1 that told us we could instantly lose the game

oh

i just reread kelsier’s role. that’s so fucking funny

1 Like

Sure I dig it

2 Likes

didn’t someone have a tinfoil that it was a town role? was it tmi

I vaguely remember someone mentioning it could be from a third party. I think that’s actually more likely TMI than saying it was from town.

fr? spurce

source

im curious- why is it more likely to be tmi if someone says it’s from 3p vs town?

it’s like if a wolf is like this ability is wolfy but clearly we didnt do it there must be some third party

For someone who’s not actively trying to solve, a publicly announced anti-town ability is going to be assumed to come from non-town.It being from town is an unnatural conclusion that is easier to reach if you’re legitimately trying to solve.

1 Like

@iamagummybear did catbae try to discredit your attempt to townread Memeking this game due to comparing him to FAM5? Im on phone and I dont know if I can search that conveniently. I think I recall this happening.

If that happened, we can safely deduce catbae is mafia. Because:

  1. He tried to dissuade a villager (gummy) from townreading another villager (Memeking) (Gummy was using FAM5 meta) by arguing that comparing mash and normal games isn’t correct (Memeking town due to Littens win condition being questionable if he subbed into a wolf slot)

Then,

  1. He tried to shade me (a villager) for sheeping Litten (a villager) by using the exact opposite argument. He is arguing by using FAM5 meta comparison himself. (“Wolves did this to Litten in FAM5 so tutuu might be doing the same here”). He is using the same argument to push two different things, both to the detriment of town agenda. (This is assuming Im not misremembering if he did the first thing here)
4 Likes

Yes, this did happen. I think it happened with both MKP and Jarek. Let me try and find the posts.

1 Like

If gummy finds those quotes catbae is mafia @everyone

Here is the receipt for Point number 2

tutuu and I have basically identical reads

2 Likes

This was me in response to catbae sussing Jarek for various reasons

This is what catbae said

this is catbae sussing mkp

this is me defending mkp bc of fam5

this is catbae’s response

@tutuu

4 Likes