it depends a lot on the player archetype imo but i do think a lot of the reactions to it were overly credulous
I don’t believe I have actually expressed a read on T3 but I do not believe for a second you have a real n0 red check lol

@tutuu why are you on mkp whats the case?
didn’t u vote memeking like right before tutuu did?
actually imagine if t3 is mafia and the team was tmi’ing him in response to the claim and we’re all here yelling at each other over it being fake

looking at u chomps
to the graveyard you go

nothing much, just didn’t have any good ideas

VOTE: Altina

what i scumread at the time was the fact that she caught up but was just replying with filler
it felt kinda forced
i don’t want to push this read hard tho
eh this is lazy butu more toward, like, nonchalant town laziness prob
I didn’t like snowe’s defense that their role requires them to be in a wolf meta or whatever when they were called out for being wolfy and I am inclined to scumread them
But the way they described trying to come into thread or whatever felt so legit
VOTE: memekingpizza
as said, don’t like the way he voted t3 there, still need to read the wall but ca see what tutuu is saying about the entry
i’m not at like locktown levels of confidence on Altina, but II think she’s a bad Day 1 wagon unless there’s a solid case against her and i’m not really seeing that, at all - the reasons for voting her so far are not that good imo
I feel like we have diametrically opposite views
Mkp didnt mske any longposts to my knowledge in fam5 or try to read and iso people
He mentioned himself that it is hard for him to generate reads and reasoning as wolf in wolfchat ladt game
trying to compare meta off a single game from a mash to a normal, even a large one, is not something i would do, ever
idc what he was like in fam tbh, i barely read his stuff and miscleared him for the investigative claim which was well done, but i’m not really going to factor any of that in
i think doing meta off a single game is pretty likely to get you burned
who is a wolf iyo
VOTE: MemeKingPizza
I can only base reads off of my own personal experience tho lmao it is mostly just food for thought
I can acknowledge that peoole are not in the same meta they were wolfing in last game; this does not necessarily exonerate them but it is a good lenses to view them with because i do think it decreases the likelihood they are maf since most people can not seamlessly transition between metas as the same alignment
I don’t know who i think is wolf atp; i can only tell you who i don’t think is wolf which i posted at some point today
Kinda expected more than “Ok” tbh
So I’m supposed to assume that I’m being lied to for literally no reason until the person who gives out information swears an oath over pain of death before I’m allowed to act on the information they’re giving?
When that “info” is a night 0 redcheck, yes
Remember the last time we had a n0 greencheck…
While I’ve never seen it happen there’s a genuine possibility that this could have been the game where I see that happen. It’s a bastard game after all
I’m having a weird moment here because I don’t thinkI believe a Night 0 redcheck on anybody for any reason, true or false, whether I’m town or wolf. So, like, I don’t really agree with catbae that wolves would be overly credulous? I don’t think there’s that high a delta over whether people believe an N0 redcheck as town or as wolf
Appreciate I could totally be a wolf faking stupidity but uhm understand that I’m a town here, so appreciate that whatever you say and do revolving this check might be taken a bit personally if you’re going to imply that I’m dumb as rocks for assuming it was real in the first place
thank u