Serpent and the Swordsman - Day 4 [6/15]

Baker was heavily trying to imply Gambler Pixie in whisper with me and Magnus and in public later

2 Likes

my fullclaim was in there

You don’t claim Pixie as Pixie

Atlas how about you?

no i wasnt

It’s difficult when those lies actively support alternative worlds, yeah.

i believed similarly, yes

1 Like

Magnus were they trying to imply Gambler Pixie

Look it’s not a debate about them being a townsfolk
It’s about whether they are exactly mutant
And if they are just do absolutely nothing and keep claiming whatever you are, don’t break madness

Will be going to sleep soon

Good night

i have a compounding migraine
so i’ll describe this later
if l.una or baker wants to transcribe the whisper and mildly change the words first they can

1 Like

My braces will cease to exist

I’ve ascended from nerd emoji

I don’t see how your fakeclaim would matter to how Baker softclaimed evil, unless they said something like ā€œI’m so happy I murdered that roleā€.

Did you not claim to them on D1?

magnus asked if i had sentry written in my card, i said i cant answer that. i gave 3 claims and we discussed about puzzlemaster and courtier

Yes they were. Or at least that’s what I had them marked as.

1 Like

Baker explicitly gave me a 3f3 which had Courtier and did not have Pixie in it.

1 Like

I don’t need the whisper transcribed. I just want a synopsis.

I had them marked as Gambler alone because I didn’t know about the competing claim but I think you two implied you did? It was Gambler Pixie zone

Pixie or Gambler, to be clear.

You don’t claim Pixie as Pixie