I think they’re probing extremely naturally without agenda.
Like they couldve pulled out whatever to retroactively justify a chomps vote OR get clout by publically “changing their mind” and chose not to do either
I think pushing someone for appearing lamist is valid, and your two communication styles clashed here wrt expectations for the interaction. I think it’s ~rand that you’re v/v tbh but i cant be sure
for instance jumping to
instead of say invoking LAMIST in the first place, trying to understand your headspace before openly sussing you and then not even voting you when you responded frankly sort of poorly (understandably. i also hate towncasing myself)
I haven’t given enough thought to the entire playerlist to give a read for everyone that I’m happy with.
I will clarify where I stand on those I have given enough thought to, however. I’m comfortable trusting Pandora and Gummy, meanwhile I’m suspicious of Soweli and Chomps.
I wouldn’t say I’m suspicious of Leafia per se, but based on what I’ve heard I’m trying to keep them in mind.
it could still happen. i think i presented it a little misleadingly. wolf leafia also gets heated, just heated in a different way, if that makes sense? She latches onto different things. In a sense it’s sort of worth upsetting her to reaction test but in a greater sense (i am her friend and i don’t like doing that) it’s not
Sorry, can you rephrase this sentence? I’m getting mixed signals from the post with my current understanding.
I don’t think that their posting was AI but i also understand your perspective that it was wolfy
This post is also pretty townie. I don’t think a wolf would bother thinking about the fact that I have no context and realize what the wording implied to someone like me. Or if mafia did consider that, it would be to try to mislead me.
This just kicks the can down the road if Pandora is mafia, which doesn’t make much sense to do here, I think.
Finally, before I’m off for a while, I looked at the numbers again and I think 9v2 is actually quite favorable.
The only risk is really if we keep missing and cohesion falls apart, but there’s a lot of wiggle room to be wrong and still recover.
Call this a message to the future if it’s needed. Also a warning that I expect wolves to want to fear-monger about an eventual towncore.
It can go both ways, you follow kill slankers or weren’t serious about that.
town leafia is more doomery. wolf leafia is more agendaed and spammy. Town leafia makes fifteen posts about how she’s clearly town and we’re gonna lose because she’s being voted and she’s town. wolf leafia makes thirty extremely long posts arguing and filling thread until nothing can get done.
100%
I didn’t even realize you had already voted her and just assumed no one had bc she had such a noncommital reaction
in my experience as a chronic slanker slankers are slankers regardless of allignment
voting lowposters just means voting the same people every fucking time regardless of allignment and at that point it’s ~rand
That’s not what gummy is, isn’t. Both voting and defending gummy should at least have good indicative and what it says about the rest that didnt picked a side yet, you know what I mean?
no i don’t i’m actually kind of confused by this post
FUCK IT’S ALMOST FIVE AM I MEANT TO BE IN BED THREE HOURS AGO
Do you remember who pushes Gummy and who defends?
okay i neeeed to go to bed so i can’t give this the proper attention but if we decide to flip gummy today and then decide to flip me tomorrow, then like fair play, we’ve been extremely alligned all day
flip gummy and theyre wolf* which leads to me being flipped whatever it’s five am
you get it