So you weren’t trying to understand the comparison and was attempting to invalidate it
i asked you questions to try to understand it, so this is invalid
can you elaborate
Nothing about this post is “trying to understand”
“Is it right to compare the two?” Yes. What now? What did you understand after that?
im done bro
HOW
keep answering my posts, we haven;t reached a conclusion, go back and look
their posts catered to me and they strongly TR me until i voted for them
Lmao
I usually remember you from hosting creative mafia setups like typrix, but in Avalon or mafia you are more easy, not serious and lesser pushy. At least in the first days. Later you provide analysis POV based on the meta you have ok others. You rarely trimmer in idle, but when you are wolf, as far I remember, you are lesser active.
what game did you have with me
what does hosting have to do with my playstyle
I think Avalon and few mafia games (?) I think… or maybe you was hosting ? I removed you as supportive
so you don’t have a clear picture of any my games and claim to know my meta?
you’re not even sure if i was playing?
It is the perfect comparison. The point is he’s paranoid whenever he’s uninformed. He’s stable when he’s informed, because he has a grasp on the game that extends outside of social reads. And no, merlin isn’t a better comparison than spy. He’s stable as a spy as well, because again he’s informed. It is again interesting to me that this line of questioning is about invalidating the comparison instead of understanding it on its own grounds and forming your opinion based on that. “I’m trying to understand by questioning the validity of the comparison” lmao
Sure, I answered
what game
i want to see what you see, what is suspicious about that?
spy is an unfair comparison to me because when I’m spy i know i can just shoot merlin at the end and am a very careless player