this was a good article that helped me understand how i can use AI in my personal life
That an entire other discussion that I donāt feel like having because I donāt feel up to hyping up the idea of bringing back assassinations to improve the meta.
Here in Romania itās the opposite. Lawyers need to get a mentor to suck up to, they also need to pass difficult exams, they also need to get into lawyer school which is hard to enter and exit and when you finally finish, thereās no such thing as lawyer corporations in Romania, so youāre a freelancer and is at fiercest competition with more seasoned lawyers in your domain and have to be a yesman slave to your client.
Prosecutor and Judge reaps all of your free time.
Notary has the same issue as lawyer on top of being really really tight to enter or pass the notary national exam.
ok you lost me lol
should one use ai in their personal life .?
i mean lawyers still need to pass difficult exams and getting into law school is a hard thing in the USA but idk its one of the more secure āhigh effort ā high payā jobs I can think of that I wouldnāt be horrible at. Like I can do all of those things and feel better about my job prospects vs. an equally talented version of me that does CS (no offense to my CS friends)
this is true - but iād argue that AI has widened the divide between students who will cut corners and students who will actually learn the material and use it in their career
school of law
Oh okay yeah you used the same example I did. We actually agree that the technology is useful. Someone I follow to read more about AI is Emily M. Bender, the director of the University of Washingtonās Computational Linguistics Laboratory. Technology like the ones used in LLMs are what that laboratory researches. She thinks ChatGPT and similar are both a net negative on society and for the field in general. There are also other scholars and researchers who have spent decades researching AI that echo the same points. All of the money in AI is going to less useful or actively harmful things now. Itās actually having the opposite effect youāre implying in the opinion of people who are doing the research you say you want done.
By the way I am really curious how your law works. For us itās more simplified because we have codification and annexed laws, but for you itās the westminster system which is based on customs dictating reality, I donāt even know how jurisprudence is meant to be applied lol
(this is kinda true also. I genuinely feel like I am absolutely skill gapping my peers in a way i normally wouldnāt without chatgpt because I am actually learning the material whereas chatgpt feasibly allows you to go through some classes for free while learning truly nothing)
bludette is becoming one with law
Our only jurisprudence that dictates interpretations and customs are more dictated by the justice supreme court, supreme constitutional court and international treaties to settle precedence.
well, one of my uses for AI is figuring out what books i should read. i also use AI to help me buy clothes, in order to figure out what iād look like if i wore certain items of clothing. stuff like that
using AI for both of the above gives me lots of value when i would have otherwise looked through 10 different websites to choose clothes to buy, or arbitrarily choosing books based on what my friends like
increasingly it doesnt the united states is cooked
ok i kid (slightly) but honestly iām so like used to common law as just How it Is and dont know enough about the civil law systems everywhere else to really make a good comparison
The world will become too complex to navigate without the aid of AI.
i will become cooked. i think people are already using ai with little to no knowledge anyway or care so fair enough
i dont think its that arbitrary to read books based on what your friends like. especially if your friends know you or are similar to you. its a useful point of reference to go āthis person liked this bookā
iāve watched at least a few shows/movies because Ash talks positively about them and i think he has good taste lol. iād rather ask him for recommendations than chatgpt
and im gonna be so real i think using chatgpt to decide what clothes to wear is pretty cooked
Civil law system just uses unitary codes. Our civil code is like below 3000 articles, then we have an unitary code for the procedure aswell.
And then we have laws or treaties that serve as annexes in case itās elaborated in there. Itās more simplified, jurisprudence is very limited for us, we do what it says in the law/code, if we have derogations itās the same thing with what the written word says.
what do you mean? instead of talking to his friends about a shared interest, like a book they all read, he can talk to ChatGPT about it instead