a lot of video games also have sequels that are better
but im not sure if thats fair since improvement often includes gameplay changes and noninteractive sequels don’t have the ability to change that
1 Like
use your words!! i asked you not a robot!!
2 Likes
Also i read a lot of westerns. Winnetou. Old Shatterhand
I haven’t started it yet i dont know what’s it about
tutuu!!!
1 Like
start the book then tell me what its about!!
1 Like
You asked me now to tell you what’s it about
you can find that out by reading the first 10 pages!
3 Likes
puss in boots 2
1 Like
harry potter book 1 is deffo not the best
nor is it the best of the movies
1 Like
doesn’t >66% of media with sequels have the sequels be better
2 Likes
HONGLOUMENG
2 Likes
what happens when we start including albums in this
1 Like
…i have to assume the artist’s first work tends to be less good than their second in the majority of cases, if we count it as “full albums”
2 Likes
but i don’t really listen to albums
1 Like
usually yeah
but i guess that’s not necessarily fair since it would be like rating somebody’s first book against a later book
rather than the next book in the same series
music doesn’t often have the same kind of sequel progression ig
1 Like
Its the only one i remember. Both film and book
ehhh i guess so?
but that effects sequels either way, regardless of same continuity. plus the first tends to be relatively smaller world building wise which can be built off of
1 Like
For tv series i think it’s rare for season 1 to be worse than 2
like everyone with basic taste can agree red room vol. 1 is worse than the owl and the elephant which is probably worse depending on how you choose than counterfeit arcade but then it gets really muddy
1 Like