This! Is not! Calc 3!
2 Likes
…calc 4?
3 Likes
calc 3 2
3 Likes
calc 3+
3 Likes
No that’s different
1 Like
calc 3 dlc
3 Likes
this but the modern game trend where they have in cartridge “dlc” for stuff that should’ve just been in the full release anyway
3 Likes
nyaaaa ok I got it
1 Like
well
still solving it but I see how you resolve the z’=yze^(-t^2)-t^2 thing
1 Like
How nya
1 Like
so first you have to solve for x(t)
you know x’(t) = 1, so x(t) = t + C, and with initial conditions you get x(t) = t
then you plug x(t) = t into your second equation, so you have y’(t) = 2 * lambda * t * y(t)
you solve that, and get y(t) = e^(lambda * t^2) ← after accounting for initial conditions
then, plug that into your third equation
the y cancels with the e^(-1 * lambda * t^2), so you get z’(t) = z - t^2 and you can solve that
2 Likes
Oh goddamnit
2 Likes
Nyaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I already submitted the damn thing
2 Likes
Well that’s good to know nya
1 Like
calc 3 concepts were made by villains
2 Likes
nyaaaaa is this actually calc 3
it feels like a cross between calc 3 and diff eq
1 Like
it’s calc 3 2
2 Likes
anyway i have a linalg test in like two days and while i remember most of the material i do have to remember what it means for a matrix to be normal vs unitary vs hermitian and what you can conclude from there
2 Likes
It’s ACalc!! A different thing!!!
2 Likes
the sample test only had like one not too difficult question on that so hopefully the real test is similar
1 Like