(no but can we like actually not)
switch wooo
this is a scam ethical dilemma but I won’t do any heavy hitters
what even are the ethics
wtf, scam
arguably if you want to limit your carbon footprint it’s more ethical to get the goat
Well that’s a bold choice. You think that switching doors will increase your chance of winning the Ferrari. That’s certainly a counterintuitive view. It seems like we’re in a fifty-fifty situation here, so it’s not clear why switching would help. But I suppose we ought to check it out, so here’s what we’re going to do.
You’re going to play a series of games against a computer opponent who will decline to switch doors when they’re asked. If you do significantly better than them, then we’ll have good reason to suppose that you were right to think that switching doors is the best strategy.
Is it ethically permissible to switch in the Monty Hall problem
why
why is your philosophy class even talking about the monty hall problem
that should be for like. a game theory course
3
WE DID IT GUYS
There are no non hard hitters
I’m super sad



