Person who believes jews have a divine right to israel
You own an unoccupied property. You are contacted by a refugee group which desperately needs somewhere to house a person seeking asylum who is being unjustly persecuted in a foreign country. Your anonymity is assured. You have every reason to believe that no harm will come to your property. Are you morally obliged to allow them to use your property?
Strongly Obliged
Weakly Obliged
Not Obliged
ARETE FLASH BANG
3 Likes
quick arete lets start a politics channel in breadbox while no one is looking
2 Likes
WAIT WRONG ONE
A charity collection takes place in your office. For every UKĀ£10.00 given, a blind personās sight is restored. Instead of donating UKĀ£10.00, you use the money to treat yourself to a cocktail after work. Are you morally responsible for the continued blindness of the person who would have been treated had you made the donation?
Responsible
Partly Responsible
Not Responsible
philosophers try not to formulate the vaguest most impossible questions to consistently answer (the fact that this is generating this much discussion means itās a good question)
2 Likes
ARETE FLASH BANG
yes obviously???
1 Like
Not responsible
FUCKING SINGER NO
1 Like
ARETE WAS FIRST
Lol no
Blindness buffs all the other senses
2 Likes
bruh its not your fault somebody else is blind
1 Like
PETER SINGER WHENEVER HE SPENDS MONEY ON GETTING A COCKTAIL INSTEAD OF DONATING TO WHATEVER THE FUCK (CLEARLY HEāS A TERRIBLE PERSON)
this but unironically
Also I think charities are scams so idk
there are too many hypothetical hoops to jump through this one, its not realistic scenario that i can relate to
1 Like
these are the questions where my logic is like āyeah you areā but then this is extremely impractical in real life and i do not want to do this 
This one is tricky.
Are you confident they will be cured?
1 Like
This is cope
1 Like