the dude goes and writes The essay on why you should give all your money to charity and then doesn’t give all his money to charity
2 Likes
If a kid was drowing, and you would have to ruin your suit that was expensive to save them, would you
1 Like
HE’S LITERALLY A RICH PHILOSOPHER. HE DONATES BUT HE DOESN’T DONATE ENOUGH FOR HIS OWN PRECEPTS. HYPOCRITE
I’m assuming yeah
i feel the same way about veganism
1 Like
yes of course I would
because im complicit in murder if I dont
It’s not wrong though
1 Like
totally different scenario
these discussions are fun
we should put them in mafia games
1 Like
i think both questions have to deal with the same thing
both have to do with little effort/money you have to spend to do something at a small cost to yourself that makes a big difference in someonee elses life
1 Like
It’s still cope though
HE LITERALLY WRITES IN THE ESSAY ABOUT HOW YOU SHOULD DONATE ALL YOUR MONEY UNTIL THE MARGINAL UTILITY LOST FROM DONATING WOULD BE MORE THAN THE MARGINAL UTILITY THEY WOULD GAIN FROM YOUR MONEY. AND HE WAS TALKING ABOUT LIKE WAR REFUGEES SO. YOU’D HAVE TO MAKE YOURSELF VERY DESTITUTE TO HIT THAT POINT. HE’S NOT DESTITUTE. PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH BOZO
3 Likes
do you think you could follow your logic but, like, partially? like instead of donating all your money to charity (obviously very impractical), you could donate 10% of your income to charity? (or if you don’t make enough to donate 10%, pick some other smaller number that you could actually do)
1 Like
I won’t have an extensive disability politics discussion in the cookie thread
2 Likes
sorry i just. fucking hate peter singer
1 Like
it’s morally correct to do so
dude this is like comparing the 2 trolley problem varients, one you swap a lever to save 5 ppl and kill one, the other you push a fat man onto the tracks to stop the train and save 5 people
3 Likes
just so you guys know
there is a cosnistent factor at the end
we will probabbly fail it soooo hard