probably though i mean. that does not change the dissonance of “you could always do x more and you are still obligated to do so”
its very different
I will say that the way disability is treated as a rhetorical device is soooo annoying
5 Likes
I disagree
The buff isn’t this good but if I could trade my eyes to double my hearing power level, i would do so in a heartbeat
1 Like
and they are the same tbthbthbththbthtbhtbhtbt nya nya nya
yes, along with every other human who didn’t do it. because the sum is quite low. but its not something that’d have to worry about in a real situation, the costs for these things is way bigger
you don’t wanna know how he treats disability in his other works
1 Like
strictly speaking the question was “are you responsible for the continued blindness of the person” not “that, and also that’s bad,” you could think it’s a good thing but that you’re still responsible for it (although if you consider blindness better than non-blindness it seems to me that some of your decisions are theoretically suboptimal under your values)
1 Like
disablity was probably the most thought provoking one i could do
it needed to be life changing and “death” doesn’t quite work for life changing since it’s death
I know if I go save the kid I saved the kid, how do I know my money actually goes to the cause and not the board members of the charity
1 Like
nah bc honestly whoever tied down the guy to the track is to blame. The other guy is just there, he did nothing
ok but this is the fault of taking answers from different people lol
1 Like
this is true in both trolley problems though
How expensive is the suit and how brilliant is the kid
getting my computer charger then posting the next
I would rather directly donate money then get robbed by a middleman, or donate and then the company gets the writeoff
anyway i refuse to answer the question because that would involve engaging in whatever bullshit singer is talking about
1 Like
I like to believe thr og trolley problem is a saw trap and the one guy maybe killed someone or smoked a ciggarette either way theyre dying
Then it’s morally bad in my opinion.
But it is cuz you know the results. Also I inherently hate charitys, cuz most of the times their motives is just questionable, and I can’t track my donations, if it went the place, they claimed it will go to.
2 Likes
Also cope