Cookie Thread Act 3: The Cookie Strikes Back

See I feel the same way but it seems people disagree. And ask for criticism evem though they don’t want it

1 Like

the preog questions were a good idea im disgusted

the cat was clearly harmed

no

the second question is different than the premise. someone casually eating a cat would bother me, not disgust me though. i wouldnt judge them if they ate it if it died in an accident and had no other food

1 Like

THIS IS TRUE

the cat was harmed already it doesn’t count

roadkill is apparently the most moral way to consume meat, according to… peta.
eating dead things to honour their memory is common in a lot of cultures, i think
or it used to be

3 Likes

Philosophy Question: You’re reading the works of a notable philosopher, and you realize they are advocating for quite heavy-handed precepts that they don’t themselves follow. Should you take anything they say seriously?

1 Like

actually
that might be fair yeah

intentionally killing them to eat them is a different matter i think

depends upon culture but using everything you kill/saw dead is absolutely a way to honor the dead

if its just cause she wanted an evening snack its kinda gross
if it was for another reason its fine

1 Like

atlas if you died could I eat you

1 Like

If you loved your cat then you should bury them properly as you would any loved one. So the act is either evidence that you didn’t really love them, or an insult to their memory.

honestly they should make cannibalism and murder legal and then we have the moral high ground

It just does not bother me ?

1 Like

yeah the question was purposefully ambiguous. thats just so cheap. its a cheap method to cause debate between people who answer this

Skill issue ?

1 Like

i was about to post the next question without reading it
its nsfw atlas so ima spoil it

no
cannibalism is really bad for you, and it could destroy hardwires in your brain or make you receive traumatic memories
only if there was an extreme emergency situation that calls for it