My previously lacklustre performance in forum mafia games was derived from an epiphenomenal denouement of diverse factors that now apply to improve my ability there, same as you would presume it would be for anyone else. That does not mean I am more “motivated” to do most things in general compared to in the past; an allocation of focus has simply shifted.
This is why you’re being called an NPC, Mogus
i find hydraing fun for the social aspect
as for achieving win aspect i think a hydra participant would need to put more effort than if it was a solo slot to achieve the same result. at least as town. might be easier for wolfing, the chaos helps
same thing for coding
if one programmer can finish a project in one month
two programmers can finish the same project in two months
i think its honestly easier but dont tell people that i like my hydras
Philosophy with

2 detectives are better than 1. 2 criminals are better than 1
Looking inward at your perspective through a smudged window, I can’t entirely see your mental processes as they occur. But I would be wanton to assume they didn’t exist, when nobody knows you better than yourself. I already know your mind is constantly turning, you’ve messaged me enough about intriguing concepts enough to drill that into my head, but the reminder is appreciated.
2 drivers aren’t better than 1 arguably. depending on the vehicle. but you get the jist
NPCs just break if you give them the wrong dialogue.
Counterpoint: having a thousand criminals isn’t always better if you’re, say, trying to rob a guy because any one of them could squeal.
So what does the graph look like?
thats because 2 drivers cant drive at the same time. doesn’t improve the quality of driving nor how fast they go
yeah exactly. 2 hydra partners cant post at the same time (literally, they mess up their posts due to the interface)
It works if they type on different pages and/or don’t refresh the site.
you can if you try :3c
me and @Garfooled acted with class and manners and when we saw we were getting in each others way we were like “no you, go ahead, you post now, ill stop”
meanwhile @May took great deal of pleasure in griefing @Zugzwang’s posts and/or posting them early every opportunity she had
If most people in the world either was a criminal or sympathised with their aims, would that not pass a new reform in constitutions / statutes / unwritten acts and fundamental precedents which would legalise said crime, making it no longer illegal and therefore sanctioned?
I mean, that’s already happened before.
this is how you do fascist dictatorships. me my friends and their employees can commit the crime everyone else who does it is evil
i can be trusted in a position of power
