I normally hate misconceptions about the law, but the presumption that “innocent before guilty” means that “every single presumption a court makes must lean toward the accused being innocent and the prosecution must prove otherwise” actually leads to funny outcomes
Reverse Ace Attorney.
fun fact
there is a written presumption in scots law that assumes if you have a bottle that’s branded with an alcoholic drink, that the presumption exists that the liquid inside is alcohol
you can destroy this statutory presumption by removing the label off the bottle and force forensics to do analysis
If the defense works, the prosecutors should immediately drag the guy to the pit and throw him in
LMAOOOO
The victim himself said it lead to narnia.
IM SOBBING
hey kyo
hello
whore. vc
I think even if you proved there was a portal down there that went somewhere the burden of proof may still shift to the defense to prove that sending someone to Narnia doesn’t constitute careless disregard because the victim not returning may allow the prosecution to still presume death.
I would argue i didnt push the victim, i just encouraged them to jump for the beef
Insane
In parkour civilization NOBODY jumps for the beef
i think i can’t really control my speech
whenever something comes into my head i just type it out, and it bugs me so much otherwise
Europapa europapa
see at least i have a very minor filter
you just say whatever nonsense you wish
And nobody can stop me mwahahahaha
Dummy girl, you fell for it