in apology or not
when we think
in apology or not
when we think
The first thing that jumps out to me is this I guess. Itâs backing up a read and providing reasoning for backing up the read instead of just coming out and saying it. Sometimes a town can just withhold reads for whatever reason - but it usually does ping me when you have a developed stance and donât come outright to say it.
This being the only thing I have doesnât give me a ton of confidence, especially when I have to actively search for it
By the way I have a green check on Atlas
I donât really know but I wouldnât put stock into this regardless
Who?
because if youâre not then I donât really see the point but if you are then you might be able to convince me not to support the wagon. Iâd be lying if I said pqwerty had nothing townie about them
notenote
Xaan works because BotC is an open setup where the risks of false information are known and weigh on everyoneâs minds. Forum Mafia doesnât really have an equivalent, particularly in closed setups. You probably donât need to worry about this.
Granted, anything could be in-play, but itâs less likely than a coinflip until thereâs any reason to suspect such might exist.
Eyy more mech more mech
wut
Is this real
Yes, it is
Activity is NAI for me, read me off of my content
(For the most part. I tend to post more as wolf actually)
Not yet, I have to be total nerd to backread all of that. It is not realistic that only town responded before my first post.
Any chance you could post some town games where you played actively?
I really hope this was a passive LOL
Hazard was a lot more serious and less relaxed as scum which I picked up on immediately
I am not seeing that here, thereâs definitely a tonal difference
Like I am not going to enjoy 4K posts
Need something to compare as i think this is my first time seeing u
Yep all right