Badass, exactly what I want to hear. You’re da best.
Sure, I’ll do that first, then I’m looking at Wazza’s ISO, aight?
Appreciated
curse of sleep denying my ability to lead an ita session at whatd normally be an optimal time for me is so sad
TL:DR though, Willow’s opening of D2 doesn’t make much sense considering what I know, especially even after prying still choosing to hide feedback that I had given them, I had given another member of mafia the same feedback so I can only see how it would be concerning for a mafia that had both received the same feedback and not a town who would probably immediately claim it
I’m not crazy in saying that if you received feedback saying that you were ruptured, as town you’d shit yourself and think it’s something much bigger than it actually is
mm. I just don’t know anymore man. I’m like never an early game player but mashes make my brain hurt especially. The person I feel I’ve seen the most from is marissa marshal incineroar (i presume she took his last name) but i dont think i’ve ever like. seen marshal in an actual mafia game nevermind locked in and because of that I find her scary but like. not with good reason
i will assemble my thoughts on ita3 direction soonish i need to eventually get up and shower first
VOTE: Daeron
im ngl like. while i think not claiming it was a little weird i dont think id have nearly as strong a reaction to that as youre sugesting
What’s the argument on the top four wagons?
Waking waking up from shutdown
From a thousand years of sleep
iiii feel like ass. and thread was not as yappy as i hoped it would be on my arrival. talk to me people. I’d really like to help you but I just dont know what to dooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
It’s more the things before it
Willow managing to get on the council was strange enough, then looking back at her D1, it doesn’t scream much to me
You could claim it was wolves trying to get someone on the council to make them suspicious, but that’s such a blanket statement to let people get away with stuff it’s ridiculous
I also think the intentional omission of feedback is always a suspicious outcome, especially coming from someone who did receive other feedback last night but didn’t omit that
Not to mention, their claim feels like BS, especially considering Arctic’s death on top of that, I can’t in any good faith consider Willow to be town with everything surrounding it, they also have been out of thread since I mentioned any of this and only returned once and didn’t say anything
If Willow’s town, I don’t care I’ll take every bit of blame I have to, but until this slot dies I’ll never be able to leave this tunnel because it’s so incredibly convincing from my perspective
I think Willow has to be aligned with ATNo in every universe here, and ATNo already flipped
2 Likes
oh. I. see what happened with harv now
I wonder why you think Ranta is Town?
meow is fairly easy to imagine why. Consistent thoughts and in display, while Ranta leans more on the opposite as someone who thinks and posts the aftermath.
I’ve been in two proper town games on here, and one other town game that lasted for two hours total or something silly.
So two games. Both town, no Evil Team.
I last played forum mafia MANY YEARS AGO but I think my playstyle between now and then is pretty representative, and that forum is still up, so if you wanna verify or debunk any of what I’m saying here then you can navigate to the two games I’ve been in on here, or to this game where I was evil from however many years ago.
Oh wait, one more preliminary note, there are some pressure tactics that we find acceptable to use on us that are detailed on the second page of this.
Generally I try to have my playstyles be similar between Good and Evil teams (don’t we all?). I try to make bold reads, see how people react, and be a helpful presence in the thread explaining mechanics and what other people mean by their arguments, because being viewed positively by the thread is useful when both Good and Evil.
I often get somewhat righteously angry at poorly conceived arguments, though will restrain my frustration for the duration it takes to confirm that the other person really does mean the ill-headed thing I think they do. This pattern persists even when Evil, and even when As Evil I know they are correct—the illogic offends even when it is by happenstance true.
The difference between my Good and Evil playstyles is that I will put my thumb on the scales as Evil. I will make an overall logical argument but it is… the third or fourth ranked one I should really be making, as it benefits the Evil Team for people to carry out. I do things like that. Another gambit of mine is to turn up the dial on my frustration at someone who would certainly inspire my wrath ordinarily, but whereas on the Good Team I may step aside and let things go, I will keep pressing as Evil, to try to influence votes more than I would on Good.
…that’s the most of it I’d say?
I really do think that one link I posted, this evil game is quite instructive, but I have literally Never gotten anyone to read it during a game thus far…
Hangh.
Anyway if all of that analysis sounds 40 to 60% useless in the context of a FAM where I’m not diligently reading all of the thread and therefore cannot fall into my usual playstyle… you would be precisely correct, it’s quite an annoying thing.
There’s a reason I got fully caught up on the thread on Day 1 you know! I then had… a minor breakdown from… something sideways to the game…
So I haven’t repeated it…
And likely won’t…
Yes. It’s quite annoying.
This is fair. VOTE: Willow
surely they just dropped the index card they wrote its role on. i do that every champs jury reveal with the advanced names
I asked to be elected multiple times because I thought it would be funny, people tred me and if they voted me. Didn’t expect it myself but I think u can read through the rest of my iso if u question my alignment
1 Like
apparently reading wazza’s ISO will give you the argument for the top one?
1 Like
What the fuck is this post idgi are we operating on the assumption there has to be wolf in council