Yeah
Deleting for legal reasons.
You are not allowed to say this
In addition, saying that you have a read that you cannot say because it would qualify as angleshooting or otherwise violate the rules qualifies as angleshooting and is not allowed.
Well I guess not angleshooty more so Leafia being mostly like, ignored by the playerbase
Could you elaborate on that please? Like what is âconfidencey reasonsâ
No
yippe people talking
Okay
I challenge your read on the basis that itâs highly self-aware from Ishmael which is a wolf tell
I knew you were going to say that
I think selfawareness is consensus considered a wolftell enough that a sufficiently selfaware Ishmael would try not to sound selfaware
Is this an Ace Attorney âI knew you were going to say thatâ or am I getting shot with a truth bullet?
Thatâs right, I think that feels intentional why itâs not pushed by the wolves becauseâŚ
Are you trying to suggest this specifically because itâs Ishmael or in general? Like who would you not apply that logic to and who would you apply it to?
I expect some level of selfawareness from t!Ishmael, so that negates it kind of out the gate, but itâs something I would generally apply to some degree to most people
Itâs a type of response I donât naturally have as wolf and had to manually incorporate
Do you have any examples to establish Ishmael as a self-aware town player, or is this just a general feeling?
I am curious about Ranta because, re-reading her, I get the sense I am in the minority of thinking her claim is mostly real and she is, at minimum, an actual third party.
However, there is also no way to ensure her role as claimed doesnât just turn into a lost wolf because of how the action resolution breaks down.
I totally get Mayâs design perspective of why it doesnât work for her, but I thought Rantaâs tone around that claim was unusually genuine. From my perusal, the only people who off-rip said this was real were Gummy (who pressed her) and Zone.
Vibes
1 Like