Jane/Amelia [SJJ/JJ] [J]
Whysper/Squirrel [SSJ/SJ] [J]
Amelia/Wazza [SSS/SS] [S]
Wazza/Isolde [SJJ/JJ] [J]
Neining this, I don’t want AT with the invest
ofc you dont
You didn’t want me with it either
Wazza forcing a 3rd Jedi policy when they could have choiced Isolde and risked a Sith is probably >rand Jedi. As it would be risky even if Wazza is Sith/Palpatine playing Liberal to play a 3rd Jedi policy. As I said before, looking good as a Sith isn’t how they win, it’s getting 6 Sith policies on the board, or electing Palpatine as Chancellor after 3+ Sith policies are on the board.
ngl I was very tempted to make Seth choose just to check him but then I remembered that a Palpatine would probably just the Jedi anyway and I’m pretty sure he’s either Jedi or Palpatine so I just didn’t care tbh
When in doubt, if there are 2 blues and 1 red. It’s better nearly 100% of the time to force a blue as Liberal/Jedi.
If we get a 4th Jedi policy on board, then whoever the Chancellor is probably near confirmed Jedi here as the Sith/Palpatine would probably be scrambling to get Sith policies on board given that the deck has been Jedi sided so far.
Now the deck should have 4 Sith and 1 Jedi left according to all the claims.
If my calculations are correct, then the chance of 3 Sith policies given the cards left is 4/5x3/4x2/3 = 0.4 or 40%.
uh
wait
but if wazza’s sith and isolde’s jedi then there’s no point in what she passes, since either way isolde passes jedi
it would be strictly better for sith wazza to pitch a jedi and claim to get 2 sith 1 jedi to both look better and confuse town
but idt that was your point
Did you though?
I got Red and Blue
Obviously I want that Triple Baby!
3 Blue’s Let’s Go!!!
spicy
why do I think that’s a reaction test?
Idk.
If it isn’t a reaction test and he’s serious then he’s just confirmed Sith.
But I think it is an RT, Wazza is definitely Jedi!
I refuse to believe otherwise.