(I kept a couple; the Jason role counts as a host argument ability, for example, it’s subjective. But yeah I really think people should be sparing with those. I’m gonna add that to my post.)
jason role you can just go “as loosely defined as possible” honestly
so we had an ogi vig that was actively worse in anni
in fairness the ability flavored about killing 24 villagers in a row in a game where wolves were never particularly in danger ever (vs the bop role where he killed like 20 villagers but as a solo wolf) is kinda pushing for you to do some absurd shit to get value out of it for flavor reasons
fwiw i considered the mera role quite weak
1 Like
It’s subjective, but I would just plant the flag on it and add a note that like “yeah it’s subjective fuck you if you disagree” and move on. I would probably go farther and say that if it’s borderline we’re siding against you, and recommend playing to the spirit of mechanic and avoid any doubt about it being non-consensus.
2 Likes
it literally could only punish mentions of multitabling
and in our discussions of whether we should be allowed to use it off of certain posts we probably caused more ogi than we prevented
2 Likes
that entire role… read the flavor of that role to extrapolate my thoughts on that role
meow
imo OGI dayvigging your lost wolf who spends the entire mash in dvc flaming the wolves is pretty peak anni
2 Likes
we stratted it btw because it’s a three shot dayvig
and my pregame argument to the effect of “okay but how many people are honestly gonna be able to say they’re multitabling anni” is in and of itself ogi
1 Like
oh also i don’t like vigs that have stupid restrictions. i actually don’t understand spam vigs.
you’re punishing people FOR PLAYING THE GAME!!!
Nah Jason’s role was faaairly easy because we were just gonna accept basically everything, the wording was “as loosely defined as possible”
The role about Jason gave you powers from previous games and thus created arguments about what’s too powerful
1 Like
Yeah that’s the point
The point of spam vigs is to disincentivize super high posting because the hosts think it’s bad for the game
1 Like
I think spamvigs are morally just
sometimes ppl need to shut the fuck up for everyone’s sake (i say this lightheartedly)
(i don’t entirely agree but spamvigs specifically are kinda funky)
1 Like
It’s supposed to be a soft postcap, previous FAMs would go “posting less than 30 or more than 300 times is not recommended”
1 Like
okay so i fundamentally disagree that people wanting to play the game a lot is bad for the game and if you think that you can just add other consequences instead of Death
I mean you would say that,
Ms. Spamvig Target herself
AD HOMINEM
1 Like