Queue Discussion Thread

Game Discussion
#4271

if anyone wants bastard design help or ideas or anything feel free to reach out to me on discord
ive been itching to do some things but also i dont think i have the capabilities to actually host any game because i feel like putting myself into a position where im responsible for the happiness of more than a dozen players is a great way for me to have a breakdown

i know its a long shot and i really don’t expect anything to come of this but i figure i might as well put it out
worst case scenario nothing happens and i dont have to do anything so its a win/win really

4 Likes
#4272

*looks at my backlog and its 20+ setups*
Uh. Thanks, but I’m good.

1 Like
22852nd poster gets a cookie (cookie thread (Part 7)) (Part 10)
#4273

…in 2024, I made “My Standards (2024)”.
It is currently 2025.
…perhaps it is time to make a new setup with a lower standards.

5 Likes
22852nd poster gets a cookie (cookie thread (Part 7)) (Part 10)
#4274

I’ll think about it

1 Like
#4275

will state re: Diplomacy that it will likely take a while to complete and im fine with another small misc game running along side it

2 Likes
#4276

is this still in the misc queue because crich plans to try to fill it again at some point, or because it just never got removed?

#4277

I understand him to intend to run it at Some Point but maybe not a soon point

3 Likes
#4278

Oh I never got round to removing that.

3 Likes
#4279
3 Likes
#4280

is the high-intensity misc slot open rn
(unsure if I’d want to run one but I’d consider it)

#4281

I have waited long enough. @tutuu @Gocj, send me the OP.

3 Likes
#4282

someone should host word match

i want to match words

2 Likes
#4283

someone should host more rp shit
i want more

2 Likes
#4284

@Ash
Wanna make a second take in the history of cursed word match games?

1 Like
#4285

(I was thinking about word match without teams, and anyone who matches in X turn advances to the next round)
Who else thinks it’s a bad idea?

2 Likes
22852nd poster gets a cookie (cookie thread (Part 7)) (Part 10)
#4286

I think it’s a funny idea, but I’m worried we’d have problems with ties and reranding words and too many rounds from too many people matching.

#4287

I guess we could do, like, first 50% of players to match or those that do in ten rounds (whichever comes first)?
But we’d also have the issue of having to wait for every single player to submit a word for the round to continue, and V kinda established that that’s not necessarily a consistent thing.

#4288

Yeah, turn/round times will be definetly longer, since we are waiting everyone’s input in every turn. (Instead of just two, who probably has the same timezone.)

We can just make that anyone who doesn’t submit in the timeframe, simply gets eliminated. (In previous WMs we couldn’t easily do that, cause they had (at least) one teammate who was still playing and relied on them to continue, but this time they wouldn’t bring anyone with them.)

Also I was thinking about the first 66% who pairs up (before the xth round) would advance. (Copying the original elimination rate.)

Everyone matching is an issue. (I want to talk about that one in PMs, cuz I have quite a few ideas.)

1 Like
#4289

Why are we going back to Cheese?
From Cheese
To Chess
To Cress (cabbages?)

Why cheese again?

1 Like
#4290

I would encourage different names yeah

1 Like