herb klein as event
2 on defense, 1 on econ
tentative
herb klein as event
2 on defense, 1 on econ
tentative
pretty simple, I think we play profiles in courage for CP 1 cube on defense and 1 on economy. we have media control, so we’ll be able to make economy the top issue, and we’ll end the cycle with +2 momentum, and an endorsement to place.
they’ll be entering the round with 0 momentum which is great for us too
Yeah @Aleph I have no problem locking in playing Profiles in Courage for 2 CP, 1 in defense 1 in economy. I know you want to keep the 24h cycle but it is the last play of the turn
okay i forgot issue shift was at the end, not the beginning, so we wont have an endorsement but will have a momentum advantage of 3-1
But yeah, actions for this turn and also momentum phase
Profiles in Courage - Use CP on Issues - 1 in defense, 1 in economy
For 2nd place issue, take a momentum
Swap economy and defense on issue track
@Aleph I feel 100% on these, so I’m down to send it. You can process whenever/whatever
momentum in the east is really great. Might wanna go first just to get it. Then, we can use momentum to pre-empt 2 of these kennedy events, and maybe our candidate to flush the last one.
I’ll let you guys look at the deck, not submitting tonight, but I think we probs just start it off ourselves and use gathering momentum in the east, then we’ll be able to preempt 2 events
With Kennedy in the east I think we should opt to go first and immediately play Gathering Momentum In The East tbh
we’ll send this at phase turn ish unless willow and soweli have thoughts
locking this in ftr
WEST:
| EV | ST | CTRL |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | CA | ![]() |
| 9 | WA | ![]() |
| 8 | KS |
|
| 8 | OK | ![]() |
| 6 | CO | ![]() |
| 6 | NE |
|
| 6 | OR | ![]() |
| 4 | AZ | ![]() |
| 4 | UT | ![]() |
| 4 | NM | ![]() |
| 4 | ND | ![]() |
| 4 | SD | ![]() |
| 4 | MT | X |
| 4 | ID | X |
| 3 | NV | X |
| 3 | AK | ![]() |
| 3 | HI | ![]() |
| 3 | WY | ![]() |
MIDWEST:
| EV | ST | CTRL |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | IL |
|
| 25 | OH | X |
| 20 | MI |
|
| 13 | IN | ![]() |
| 13 | MO | ![]() |
| 12 | WI | X |
| 11 | MN | X |
| 10 | IA |
|
| 10 | KY | ![]() |
SOUTH:
| EV | ST | CTRL |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | TX | ![]() |
| 14 | NC | ![]() |
| 12 | GA | ![]() |
| 12 | VA | X |
| 11 | TN | X |
| 11 | AL | ![]() |
| 10 | LA |
|
| 10 | FL | X |
| 8 | AR | ![]() |
| 8 | MS | ![]() |
| 8 | SC | ![]() |
EAST:
| EV | ST | CTRL |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | NY |
![]()
|
| 32 | PA |
|
| 16 | NJ | ![]() |
| 16 | MA |
|
| 9 | MD | ![]() |
| 8 | CT | ![]() |
| 8 | WV | ![]() |
| 5 | ME | ![]() |
| 4 | RI |
|
| 4 | NH | ![]() |
| 3 | DE | ![]() |
| 3 | VT | ![]() |
TOTAL:
Nixon:238
Kenny: 207
I vote we play pierre salinger and let them either
-burn their momentum on that one, letting us play the other two straight provided they can’t get another momentum marker somehow
-let them not burn their momentum marker, and then we can safely get rid of the other two events through campaign strategy deck and using the candidate.
we could probably just play it on the issues, 1 cube per issue
I’m down to just send it tbh, soweli you’re here what do you think
i’m not really paying attention if i’m being real but that seems generally sound
i can probably look at things more in like an hour if you want
Well honestly no it makes the most sense tbh. It’s our best move. Shows we have a weak hand but it averts absolute disaster either way.
Okay
@Aleph Play Pierre Salinger for CP and put 1 cube on each issue. Obviously can’t pre-empt so we just gotta let them have it if they want it.